Date:	Thu, 24 Jun 1999 01:09:21 +0200
To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: performance issue
Message-ID:	<19990624010921.V614@cerebro.laendle>
Mail-Followup-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Operating-System:	Linux version 2.3.6 (root AT cerebro) (gcc driver version pgcc-2.95 19990524 (prerelease) executing gcc version 2.7.2.3)
From:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Reply-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, Jun 23, 1999 at 01:46:20PM -0700, Eugene Leitl wrote:
> 
> <idiotmode>
> Apropos another CPU you don't have: do you think that K7 will be as
> quirky as K6 in respect to compiler options? Assuming both egcs/gcc
> and pgcc.
> </idiotmode>

What do you mean by quirky? Bad performance? I have no idea, but I haver
the strongest beliefs that the K7 will be fast as fast can be, if they
only get the board design correct ;)

--  
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT goof DOT com      |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |

- Raw text -