Date:	Tue, 8 Jun 1999 23:17:32 +0200
To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: trouble compiling gcc as cross-compiler to m68k
Message-ID:	<19990608231732.T5168@cerebro.laendle>
Mail-Followup-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
References:	<NLGFKBBDFNFBGAAA AT theglobe DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<NLGFKBBDFNFBGAAA@theglobe.com>; from Johnny Casey on Tue, Jun 08, 1999 at 11:17:58AM -0700
X-Operating-System:	Linux version 2.2.7 (root AT cerebro) (gcc driver version pgcc-2.93.09 19990221 (gcc2 ss-980929 experimental) executing gcc version 2.7.2.3)
From:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Reply-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Jun 08, 1999 at 11:17:58AM -0700, Johnny Casey wrote:

> correct me if i am wrong, but glibc 2.x defines a lot of string
> functions (*str*) with hand tuned macros and *a lot* of older source
> decided to not use headers when all they wanted was one function
> definition.

Worse, they decided to add prototypes BUT ALSO included the header file ;)

> offending definition. this also appears with rogue definitions of
> sys_error not being as generous with const as the recent glibc.

-D__NO_STRING_INLINES -D__NO_MATH_INLINES might help with the string and
math functions (but not with missing const).

--  
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT goof DOT com      |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |

- Raw text -