Date:	Wed, 24 Mar 1999 12:25:16 +0100
To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: bug in pgcc ?
Message-ID:	<19990324122516.D26863@cerebro.laendle>
Mail-Followup-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
References:	<36F81D39 DOT 6A5585FB AT poly DOT polytechnique DOT fr>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<36F81D39.6A5585FB@poly.polytechnique.fr>; from Stephane Donze on Wed, Mar 24, 1999 at 12:01:13AM +0100
X-Operating-System:	Linux version 2.2.3 (root AT cerebro) (gcc driver version pgcc-2.93.09 19990221 (gcc2 ss-980929 experimental) executing gcc version 2.7.2.3)
From:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Reply-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, Mar 24, 1999 at 12:01:13AM +0100, Stephane Donze wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I tried to compile the Mesa 3.0 library with pgcc (gcc version
> pgcc-2.91.60 19981201 (egcs-1.1.1 release) ), to make it faster.
> However, the demo programs did not work correctly any more,  a big part
> of the triangles were not displayed. I tried different optimization
> flags (-O3, -O0, -ffast-math) but none worked. Compiling with gcc 2.8.1,
> with the same options, produces a good result.

Removing the over-agressive -ffast-math should fix that problem.

--  
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT goof DOT com      |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |

- Raw text -