X-pop3-spooler:	POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 4 980420 -bs-
Message-ID:	<19981020213912.G7489@cerebro.laendle>
Date:	Tue, 20 Oct 1998 21:39:12 +0200
From:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
To:	Steven Snyder <ssnyder AT indy DOT net>,
	pgcc mailing list <beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl>
Subject:	Re: What does the -O9 switch do?
Mail-Followup-To:	Steven Snyder <ssnyder AT indy DOT net>,
	pgcc mailing list <beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 96 DOT 981020102459 DOT 133A-100000 AT indy1>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Mutt 0.93.2i
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.96.981020102459.133A-100000@indy1>; from Steven Snyder on Tue, Oct 20, 1998 at 10:35:59AM -0500
X-Operating-System:	Linux version 2.1.125 (root AT cerebro) (gcc version pgcc-2.92.09 19980921 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental))
Status:	RO
Lines:	29

On Tue, Oct 20, 1998 at 10:35:59AM -0500, Steven Snyder wrote:
> The pgcc Web page documents the optimizations enabled by -O3 through -O6,
> but is silent on higher optimizations.  (The gcc man pages don't mention
> anything higher than -O3.)  What, for instance, does -O9 do that -O6 does
> not?

It should do nothing more than -O6 (or -O3 for gcc). You can specify
-O69 if you want...

> Since the egcs/pgcc 1.1a compilers no longer write the switches to the
> generated asm file (can we please, please, please get that feature back?)
> there's no way to tell which flags were used in a given compilation.

Doesn't -fverbose-asm work?

> Binary files built with -O6 and -O9 do compare differently sometimes (for


I once (for a few revisions) had loop unrolling and sibling call
optimizations enabled with -O7, but that was only for a short time in the
snapshots. Otherwise the files should compare the same.

      -----==-                                              |
      ----==-- _                                            |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann       +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT goof DOT com       |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\                          --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                        |
                                                          |

- Raw text -