X-pop3-spooler:	POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 4 980420 -bs-
Message-ID:	<19980925125330.B198@cerebro.laendle>
Date:	Fri, 25 Sep 1998 12:53:30 +0200
From:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
To:	beastium <beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl>
Subject:	Re: snapshot 19980921
Mail-Followup-To:	beastium <beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl>
References:	<19980922195258 DOT 24738 AT cerebro DOT laendle> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 980923132245 DOT 2066C-100000 AT c2m2-17 DOT nada DOT kth DOT se>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Mutt 0.93.2i
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.3.95.980923132245.2066C-100000@c2m2-17.nada.kth.se>; from Michael Hanke on Wed, Sep 23, 1998 at 01:24:07AM +0200
X-Operating-System:	Linux version 2.1.122 (root AT cerebro) (gcc version pgcc-2.92.06 19980914 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental))
Status:	RO
Lines:	24

On Wed, Sep 23, 1998 at 01:24:07AM +0200, Michael Hanke wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Sep 1998, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> 
> > Major changes in this snapshot
> > - renamed "amdk6" to "k6" (i.e. -mcpu=k6, -mk6...)
> > - imported amd-k6 support from egcs
> Does this mean that egcs and pgcc produce identical code for amd
> processors????

No, but scheduling and the naming of the switches should be - almost -
identical.

Why the four ???? ? Is egcs -mcpu=k6 too slower?

BTW, I botched the -mk6/-mk5/-mcyrix etc. switches in the last snapshot,
they will work in the next one ;)

      -----==-                                              |
      ----==-- _                                            |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann       +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT goof DOT com       |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\                          --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                        |
                                                          |

- Raw text -