X-pop3-spooler:	POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 4 980420 -bs-
Message-ID:	<19980914220355.03896@cerebro.laendle>
Date:	Mon, 14 Sep 1998 22:03:55 +0200
From:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
To:	Steven Snyder <ssnyder AT indy DOT net>, Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Cc:	Hans Dumbrajs <hans AT clinet DOT fi>, beastium <beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl>
Subject:	Re: Problems with Linux kernel compiled with pgcc
Mail-Followup-To:	Steven Snyder <ssnyder AT indy DOT net>,
	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>, Hans Dumbrajs <hans AT clinet DOT fi>,
	beastium <beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl>
References:	<19980914032524 DOT 50325 AT cerebro DOT laendle> <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 96 DOT 980914075151 DOT 22269B-100000 AT indy1>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.96.980914075151.22269B-100000@indy1>; from Steven Snyder on Mon, Sep 14, 1998 at 07:58:54AM -0500
X-Operating-System:	Linux version 2.1.120 (root AT cerebro) (gcc version pgcc-2.91.57 19980901 (egcs-1.1 release))
Status:	RO
Lines:	14

On Mon, Sep 14, 1998 at 07:58:54AM -0500, Steven Snyder wrote:
> I think that the compiler restriction on 2.0.x kernel building depends on
> *which* modules are compiled.

might well be the case ;) But I wouldn't try. Hmm.. but its often riskier to
use pgcc than gcc, if it works its ok ;)

      -----==-                                              |
      ----==-- _                                            |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann       +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT goof DOT com       |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\                          --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                        |
                                                          |

- Raw text -