X-pop3-spooler:	POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 4 980420 -bs-
Message-ID:	<19980904214400.03254@cerebro.laendle>
Date:	Fri, 4 Sep 1998 21:44:00 +0200
From:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
To:	Krzysztof Strasburger <strasbur AT chkw386 DOT ch DOT pwr DOT wroc DOT pl>
Cc:	beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl
Subject:	Re: pgcc-1.1a - first impression
Mail-Followup-To:	Krzysztof Strasburger <strasbur AT chkw386 DOT ch DOT pwr DOT wroc DOT pl>,
	beastium-list AT desk DOT nl
References:	<m0zEtRS-0000FVC AT chkw386 DOT ch DOT pwr DOT wroc DOT pl>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<m0zEtRS-0000FVC@chkw386.ch.pwr.wroc.pl>; from Krzysztof Strasburger on Fri, Sep 04, 1998 at 10:50:00AM +0000
X-Operating-System:	Linux version 2.1.119 (root AT cerebro) (gcc version pgcc-2.91.57 19980901 (egcs-1.1 release))
Status:	RO
Lines:	22

On Fri, Sep 04, 1998 at 10:50:00AM +0000, Krzysztof Strasburger wrote:
> The code optimized with -O5 -fno-runtime-lift-stores is even faster on PPro ;-)
> 
> 29.22   28.55  26.71 (average)
> It means for me, that instead of waiting 1 year for the results, I will
> get them after 11 months! ;-)

But after waiting 11 months, how about going on vacation for four weeks?

;)

Is -fno-runtime-lift-stores slower/faster on pentium? Maybe I just disable
it for ppro, until I come around to make it better.


      -----==-                                              |
      ----==-- _                                            |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann       +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT goof DOT com       |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\                          --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                        |
                                                          |

- Raw text -