X-pop3-spooler:	POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 4 980420 -bs-
Message-ID:	<19980708183856.23220@cerebro.laendle>
Date:	Wed, 8 Jul 1998 18:38:56 +0200
From:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
To:	beastium <beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl>
Subject:	Re: please benchmark / MMX #2
Mail-Followup-To:	beastium <beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl>
References:	<19980708045815 DOT 20996 AT cerebro DOT laendle> <199807080913 DOT LAA03546 AT Cal012054 DOT student DOT utwente DOT nl>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<199807080913.LAA03546@Cal012054.student.utwente.nl>; from Derkjan de Haan on Wed, Jul 08, 1998 at 11:13:21AM +0200
X-Operating-System:	Linux version 2.1.108 (root AT cerebro) (gcc version pgcc-2.91.43 19980628 (gcc2 ss-980502 experimental))
Status:	RO
Lines:	21

On Wed, Jul 08, 1998 at 11:13:21AM +0200, Derkjan de Haan wrote:
> 
> For Intel Pentium-MMX (3*100 MHz):
> 
> because of these small differences I decided to test a bigger input file
> (static mozilla binary, 6 Mb filesize). Here the picture become clearer:
> 
> mmx:        25.34
> nommx:    29.30
> mmxonly: 25.16

Looks good, maybe with some tuning and aggressive analysis (and maybe a
different benchmark program) mmx can be a win to pentiums as well.

      -----==-                                              |
      ----==-- _                                            |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann       +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT goof DOT com       |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\                          --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                        |
                                                          |

- Raw text -