X-pop3-spooler:	POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 4 980420 -bs-
Date:	Wed, 01 Jul 1998 00:59:27 +0200
From:	Fox <fox AT cclinf30 DOT polito DOT it>
Subject:	Re: bzip2-mx vs. bzip2-nomx
To:	beastium <beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl>
Reply-to:	fox AT cclinf30 DOT polito DOT it
Message-id:	<98070101044400.00560@FoxServer.fox.net>
X-Envelope-to:	beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl
MIME-version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	KMail [version 0.6.5]
Sender:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Status:	RO
X-Status:	A
Lines:	14

> K6-3D and K6-2 are much stronger in this area. They have a dual MMX core
> and will perform better on MMX.

>is anybody with such beasts here that can test them against the two bzips?

Hello
I have just subscribed to this mailing list so I don't exactly know what
the discussion is about but I am wondering if there is a pgcc option in
order to compile an mmx code (i use -mpentiumpro at the moment).
I have a K6 233 but not a k6 2 will it be the same ?? How can I compile
bzip2 for mmx ???

Bye
                Fox

- Raw text -