X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=psjt.org;
	s=psjt01; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:
	Subject:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
	Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
	:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:
	List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
	bh=ceWQ52vU5ZoHNo7cda7OMpI7UQqeliUu2oyqLgyL78I=; b=bi5eKrSDaO3TK7aGaqAFH9A1lK
	2UkJwHfyLRulKl5u88EAd19+74Yqr16euJRzcARyX/NoMoX3UubYDFXh4QKEA4+PYtQ/L9HNpQ4kE
	lMO+2q2H/Owi/CigGGof3zaAGW2szlzK3mn7em4QWTszR6LmhaQiqn1J7EMrSCiXMBN75142tjrKl
	VwTXyZzvXTZ2rSsSR9jCGAS8R4hfDQUYUqTcemiuanwHrnt//YKAkfGcpmKl3ZvpX+Y+9OExI5llQ
	8Ax3htAD8TJJpW8D9EFBjZb6gAOoymdeVkwSD1bOHfiYWEP349BNZdgiw7ieVqqtHJWwYj3E50n1O
	wKthZKrg==;
From:	"=?utf-8?Q?Stephan_B=C3=B6ttcher?= (geda AT psjt DOT org) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	"karl AT aspodata DOT se [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] lepton netlist
In-Reply-To:	<20240424134027.DA8B681AB8A3@turkos.aspodata.se>
	(geda-user AT delorie DOT com's message of "Wed, 24 Apr 2024 15:40:27 +0200
	(CEST)")
References:	<s6nil076f0t DOT fsf AT psjt DOT org>
	<20240424112803 DOT C0DAC81AB8A3 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
	<s6njzknc4rc DOT fsf AT psjt DOT org>
	<20240424134027 DOT DA8B681AB8A3 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
Date:	Wed, 24 Apr 2024 19:16:13 +0200
Message-ID:	<s6n8r12d6le.fsf@psjt.org>
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

"karl AT aspodata DOT se [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
writes:

> Stephan:
>> I do not know any guile.  My patch was in C, but the attachment points
>> were moved to scheme, I guess.
>
> Yes, your file s_hierarchy.c doesn't exist any more. It is mentioned
> in commit 597b38ef193d4249e74fea04c131af078bd9ccd5.
>
>> I do remember that somebody implemented similar functionality, but I do
>> not remember which fork that was.
>
>>From what I remember geda has it, unfortenatly I cannot compile it here.
> geda commit c7ed6c5a10cbfba3001b6b2e55bbc3ed0f1e84b8 is probably what I
> remember.
>
> ...
>> My patch was doing simple text substitutions in attributes after the
>> hierarchy was built, so the parameters cannot effect the netlist
>> itself, just some output.  I used it only with value= attributes.  That
>> would be the minimal functionality.
>
> So, it would be the bom list and the like that would be affected ?
> In that case an external program could do the transform, so you do your
> usual stuff and then as a final step you modify some output files with a
> separate program. Would that be fine (at least till it is integrated 
> into lepton) ?

I extract my boms from the .pcb file, and usually there are a lot of
handwritten changes before it goes to a technician, so it is not
essential to have this functionally in the netlister.  When the bom now
says value=$R2 it is at least obvious where I need to add information :-)

>> Something that can also affect, e.g., source= attributes may be quite a
>> bit more intrusive.
>
> What is the idea with that ?

I do not know if that may be usefull for somebody.  One of the
criticisms of my patch was that is is too limitted.

-- 
Stephan

- Raw text -