X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
	h=from:date:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to;
	bh=1TRPGPcCdv+IIvY12IU4YEmP8inFxKmtzqVCVNmx61o=;
	b=HdmmU/QUD3pNeLMZ9+PlqUi446C5GdiCP1TNB1vIXzrBjfa3kr/TXcFVV5dqOrF7Xo
	Kb24N3dB5Cx3/jQV/DTcMDs674s2Njo+3tm+ZOh8TT6RHWGghgVc98LJ5IHra/aLpJxn
	5xY9CvKDgxtxdBmt81AKLsjGDXPPXqx4A0vL4vv2MckalM84YWvavNhos53veIVLFT6B
	bUGuhSW4lU/QCrkiqKP3WM5W9oa3qN2wR9pcsFfmDrr/MjuHayx2SmrcMxJN2w1hv2Vl
	Rb+DaDnZ7LXRygqsfc/eyIeGeKXfs97etADRf5PlynercrwzGoUd47IwpNSh+WSZyUe0
	9okg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to
	:references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to;
	bh=1TRPGPcCdv+IIvY12IU4YEmP8inFxKmtzqVCVNmx61o=;
	b=OhPbkl5+icGnbGJW2YEbG4CnOyfzkzZLsWmoFRKYxWcbXBVdEqTy+9+YbFeJzobpTU
	K9WrVjEoICM0ybrz9MYMgrdqB/30THzA7HbazjQaBykkVHNvtlh/7I9xYZAI9Xk52l2D
	F2R8o+q/zgheP1ZbGMF5N84wUY97cdINYzP6ZVzctv3Zc7fmL0BWYHdxoAWCuBgnSR/E
	93/TJOSkHTZMmMqkAYupy5qw0tjFFVAQlCH3kLnEvYnMl7fNyD6wPhwSGXdyrViC9e6M
	17P32iLrJJnfN1QDHrp+JpL7jcXsWnKNza9W0OUA7xWpV5shl3HvThyVCXKWN3f3/ds9
	XVbA==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AOAM532APXZXpcpKzcCENbVxhnKfW+MeUjy8mgVLcNCFiIC8CzPk6yiy
	RcxaYeePVcCncIe8UczOva+3+94OqgE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source:	ABdhPJxMievRIQ1AsA36suJ4XLF0d5s30PrQfGLOVpTzhaT6STAyy30AkbvXINcwipdOfT490zArtQ==
X-Received:	by 2002:a2e:4a1a:: with SMTP id x26mr2707208lja.178.1626334955028;
	Thu, 15 Jul 2021 00:42:35 -0700 (PDT)
From:	"Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Google-Original-From:	Vladimir Zhbanov <vzh AT lepton>
Date:	Thu, 15 Jul 2021 10:42:32 +0300
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] file format cooperation
Message-ID:	<YO/m6LlHeHTdWkaB@lepton>
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<9f6960b4-e3e7-7a99-7617-77e51e6bee4c AT xs4all DOT nl>
	<b2eb7bb5-4682-3c34-3d25-8caaa34e4a75 AT xs4all DOT nl>
	<20210714104650 DOT 7F50483DB04D AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20210714104650.7F50483DB04D@turkos.aspodata.se>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Karl,

On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 12:46:50PM +0200, karl AT aspodata DOT se [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
...

> What I urge for is that semantics be the same and continuously agreed on
> by both groups.

I'm still not sure what you're asking about.  Pediwikia reads many
general words about this topic word in different contexts, mostly
without useful examples.

What's the `semantics' word does mean practically to you, in
person, in the gEDA context?  Could you elaborate a bit more on
this?  Just schematic/symbol attributes and their interpretation
in netlists?  Or something more?

> Changing the underlaying file syntax would not change nor help with
> that.

If it doesn't touch `semantics'? ;-)

-- 
  Vladimir

- Raw text -