X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Originating-IP:	84.92.49.234
Date:	Sat, 28 Jul 2018 20:04:13 +0100
From:	Chris Green <cl AT isbd DOT net>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Hierarchy in gschem - how?
Message-ID:	<20180728190412.GA27016@esprimo>
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<20180728125649 DOT GA22385 AT esprimo>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 20 DOT 1807281507220 DOT 2636 AT nimbus>
	<20180728140448 DOT GA22943 AT esprimo>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 20 DOT 1807281840280 DOT 15336 AT nimbus>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.DEB.2.20.1807281840280.15336@nimbus>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
X-Spam-Level:	*
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 06:41:39PM +0200, Roland Lutz wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2018, Chris Green wrote:
> > I am only using gschem, I'm not doing any PCB layout or netlist
> > extraction.
> 
> In this case, you can completely ignore the hierarchy mechanism and just
> draw the schematic in a way that comes natural to you.
> 
No I can't!  :-)

I need to use sub-schmematics to be able to fit everything on one top
level.

-- 
Chris Green

- Raw text -