www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: geda-user/2018/07/12/00:06:33

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.6
X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: repl
X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: inbox
From: karl AT aspodata DOT se
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] adventures using arrows (for documentation), or cross my lines
In-reply-to: <1531363092.2191172.1437992056.3A4E875E@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References: <20180702125528 DOT D32CF81F76FE AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20180709204944 DOT GA921 AT debian DOT lokolhoz> <1531286153 DOT 3131974 DOT 1436831304 DOT 36E05F01 AT webmail DOT messagingengine DOT com> <20180711182359 DOT 227FE81F772D AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <1531363092 DOT 2191172 DOT 1437992056 DOT 3A4E875E AT webmail DOT messagingengine DOT com>
Comments: In-reply-to "Edward Hennessy (ehennes+oss AT fastmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
message dated "Wed, 11 Jul 2018 19:38:12 -0700."
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <20180712035816.26F69841DE80@turkos.aspodata.se>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 05:58:16 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

Ed:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018, at 11:23 AM, karl AT aspodata DOT se wrote:
> > Edward Hennesy:
> >> I’d like to suggest a fourth option:
> >> D, Add another line style “TYPE_NONE” where the line is not drawn.
> > 
> > I would not support that idea, better is to have no default width and> instead of writing 0 in the line width column, write a real width
> > like 5 or 10, and let 0 in effect be either "as thin as possible" or
> > "no line".
> 
> Older schematics and symbols in existing libraries contain 0 in the line
> width.

Yes, it's stupid.

> Maintaining backward compatibility and a new definition of width
> 0 would be more difficult to implement.

Yes.

Perhaps the only place it is useful to have width = 0 is in filled
paths, and I'm guessing that paths are not much used, so one could
break compatibility just there without too much breakage.

Regards,
/Karl Hammar

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aspö Data
Lilla Aspö 148
S-742 94 Östhammar
Sweden
+46 173 140 57


- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019