X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=027fldXWl9D2ZG5VcnDnNshpgoQjTcqRcjuyoiUhhSA=;
	b=qE8jlpoNI3tBSALdTGt5ezWAcvkLAnxP77f4K5sad/e2T5sfIYI2A+eNb1t5ijrput
	3lI+OzNniTnvMGU3I2FTfsvymQfzchkw5EYYZSExpy+cgrfdsz+f7ArzKqJmowZ2g/hj
	wU+p+WAlLJZUWQNQSUe0kHn/l/SdUfMKmS/GOIk1Wz24WZY/X1a3mQ9QEorQkZEfZTqf
	zmVAwskNFL81hsezZ996CchAzu5MMxiGILD0z/i7ddFhT8IPkFfasyzIJx5kYBkliyM2
	JO0n1proewvdpGGDHFcdt24j4rOYjOPxCEAdyEDsgSjk1q9XzxwKmzsv72ME5m3dNquc
	zX4Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=027fldXWl9D2ZG5VcnDnNshpgoQjTcqRcjuyoiUhhSA=;
	b=Nq3pl4I/nbts/zJqH0vPzcqtOBWF+SqEVdhQCKAO10KUIgjn1I8ty250+cCYj8sjHP
	N9w2kYVrc5mqag8rfwhvwSTeephCyirxQ2S/6NC22bYdsUR76hj8oCdJuZHGPlEGIntu
	/6KDWwLwlLpo16MZ4L7K5A37bOV4aRLOZy84UzKfnGs5BAAqf+3C47OD9ITWSYdaRyFn
	QPgTGoqHkegd1P2cHl/X307GNyvdfTpZoRwmX2SnC1+gEsZ987NDDzersYJxD3GA3pf7
	cjdA6KI9DGlzomnAwYUR4O594+NGyF2Bx5Q6Er1Lxrcg7R4yQRxGcYyR9SIUWQ8UqLib
	ReDg==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AIkVDXLYbDzjRKXKKne5/sDPI7tadpPWA63yyBiklev0fZhvMhoHjzZEQLesYn2CNjU2Cw==
X-Received:	by 10.46.75.2 with SMTP id y2mr5319575lja.18.1485635892085;
	Sat, 28 Jan 2017 12:38:12 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Sat, 28 Jan 2017 21:38:08 +0100
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] PCB antenna question
Message-Id:	<20170128213808.dab67b09e5d27f99f337da87@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAJXU7q9GkEOuzakRg3=hU3QVmC_gc=mnsarnUoJfKH3DNwjOcg@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<1485607260 DOT 3072 DOT 77 DOT camel AT linetec>
	<CAJXU7q8k4synABy2rOSbjmcarmZ_TONwKxG7ED9f4mP6jAiwJw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1485629830 DOT 3072 DOT 163 DOT camel AT linetec>
	<CAJXU7q9GkEOuzakRg3=hU3QVmC_gc=mnsarnUoJfKH3DNwjOcg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> If you short the schematic, you might as well make both connection points
> on the antenna "1" though.... drc won't help you in either case.

In that case they are one net.

> Anyway, as said it's not a big deal, mostly because designs usually
> don't have lots of antennas or other special elements made out of copper
> traces (e.g. inductors or heating areas). Still it would be nice if the
> functionality for this could be implemented some day.

A single or a few warnings is not a big problem.

> The other classic use (although slightly different) is implementing
> different net names for signals connecting a star ground. In this case, it
> isn't some rf or resistive component you instantiate, but a node point.

This might also be useful to separate a trace used for measurement signals.

> In the antenna case, what you possibly want is copper shape definitions
> that are explicitly not followed for checking connectivity. (Might need to
> implement a keep away rule to avoid accidental shorts that could then go
> undetected).

It is neglected during the short circuit detection but during clearance test it could still be checked, I think anyway. To keep away from the antenna is probably needed anyway.

> For the pcb resistor / inductors, I guess similar could work - although it
> is probably desirable to implement within some kind of "footprint" like
> construct in order to get the end connection points tested as a part of the
> netlist.

An almost normal pad would do the trick. A normal pad have show up in the solder mask and paste layer but this should almost certainly not.

- Raw text -