www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: geda-user/2017/01/28/09:32:44

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=earthlink.net;
s=dk12062016; t=1485613880; bh=iVxhfgCA/EzvApKKGJ5BlfqwIR/aEib6hURZ
XIOKmhQ=; h=Received:Subject:To:References:From:Organization:
Message-ID:Date:User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; b=fBuc9Kk
ZxbB8uva+KcqNM9111fTKepreb3WFVsFfjoB3zCHA62NH/sHaRrdQ6ieCkozRIIAMDo
l1vOxdQMui2cI0BZgga6AbMwjp0/3WqjPTI746nvF9HuxNIaCaLVRLdwLm6QQDW6Vzg
YrOjF1ma1tEuYnvZbNCZCV84dWoHWBLd6CoYeaKzZ/XlGKtjyEL4Hzkw/1TZ04ZK2qm
m1UrNhVo2b3/IvXbC69b/gtWX26X4F/KHvAZth2adOCotpz0IMSjj9SCUgKe6vDp+sm
pB8t/FB66h9+W60HqQLNnaOzafPFoFV0g/I+DhRByKBwpzMibYLS0Ubft+hixWvcJfw
==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=dk12062016; d=earthlink.net;
b=HrAmlwHorTAwpNdcGhONi1na4HN8MwP0vfAA/n40O6j1GO/vday72rEh2rYuU7B0IFV5ychH33OD3bcv56vP6aJ83LTHs5fPHZFdeOPTRH6eD9zPzxwI9jJUf0/RSFiStrPS7oaDSKS69C8UTGR2iOE8A4+S1kAyeTgO22/KHipk9EiR1qjvbKurXdRd9r2oyWHmQoA7Ob7+8wT4SeAujKz7d9vCYy9c+HeUZW1w93ucKaCWlWhYBM7RM9vJLpw8lZfbUgUgKQOB9Od4f+Fo1u7v8gNuOpd5HsTvno3R6a/vGcDH7zcNp7VN7kCX1tZSUeJzXj8Ody5dEvltqsVRVg==;
h=Received:Subject:To:References:From:Organization:Message-ID:Date:User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Subject: Re: [geda-user] PCB antenna question
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References: <1485607260 DOT 3072 DOT 77 DOT camel AT linetec>
From: "David W. Schultz (david DOT schultz AT earthlink DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Organization: State of Total Disorganization
Message-ID: <f6280e7e-36a9-68be-bc2c-aa8b49cf79d3@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 08:31:14 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1485607260.3072.77.camel@linetec>
X-ELNK-Trace: a4aefb9622f3b04c5fcedd19d8a1076574bf435c0eb9d4781bddcdbdb18fe5660a4cba243375e27182dc72b9e13b12b9350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 108.194.110.119
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 01/28/2017 06:41 AM, Richard Rasker (rasker AT linetec DOT nl) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> I tried redefining these lines in several ways using a text editor (by
> changing the pad numbers(*)), but PCB insists on treating the whole
> thing as a collection of shorted nets -- which of course is technically
> correct, but not what is desired.
> 
> Simply said: Is there a way to create a 'shorted' element that isn't
> treated as a short circuit by PCB?

You can use the Line element (not ElementLine) instead of pad for most
of the loop using Pad for the endpoints. This solves most of the problem
but it does leave those two pads shorted.

-- 
David W. Schultz
http://home.earthlink.net/~david.schultz
"Life without stock is barely worth living..." - Anthony Bourdain

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019