X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-CM-Score:	0.00
X-CNFS-Analysis:	v=2.2 cv=IItyMknG c=1 sm=1 tr=0
	a=3fABx4uJ6eXoS02SKkQYwQ==:117 a=3fABx4uJ6eXoS02SKkQYwQ==:17
	a=13zjGPudsaEWiJwPRgMA:9 a=WbPmnYzAfxEA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=Mj1Xp5F7AAAA:8
	a=fKamI9vWn0kNvQ082P0A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=ApJ1wX6aPeIA:10
	a=LDfBg_zj_0BVz4xZ4g8A:9 a=ONNS8QRKHyMA:10 a=6kGIvZw6iX1k4Y-7sg4_:22
	a=OCttjWrK5_uSHO_3Hkg-:22
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] [pcb-rnd] in Debian testing - why no emphasis on fork
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1701070418310 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv>
	<CAOxVtSSmQQQM+VbdqkPTibrMRtspeKRz6PHHmMxXpsW9BfRMhA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1701070909420 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv>
	<CAOxVtSSBTxi8bvjJmZzLng5bJb2MMxVJRMzZqDTvFkam+9DCsQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
From:	"M. J. Everitt (m DOT j DOT everitt AT iee DOT org) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Openpgp:	id=BA266E0525CFAB101523351B4C30334F93C22371
Message-ID:	<baf486b3-44a4-6ed7-18a8-0005432b0540@iee.org>
Date:	Sat, 7 Jan 2017 10:07:36 +0000
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAOxVtSSBTxi8bvjJmZzLng5bJb2MMxVJRMzZqDTvFkam+9DCsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--VMiL3jEDFHks12Bx5afLJvk1AWATxKslm
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="5Wc6MKp8FFRWMGhbgJwt0xgdFb1oDklP0"
From: "M. J. Everitt" <m DOT j DOT everitt AT iee DOT org>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <baf486b3-44a4-6ed7-18a8-0005432b0540 AT iee DOT org>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] [pcb-rnd] in Debian testing - why no emphasis on fork
References: <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1701070418310 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv>
 <CAOxVtSSmQQQM+VbdqkPTibrMRtspeKRz6PHHmMxXpsW9BfRMhA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1701070909420 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv>
 <CAOxVtSSBTxi8bvjJmZzLng5bJb2MMxVJRMzZqDTvFkam+9DCsQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOxVtSSBTxi8bvjJmZzLng5bJb2MMxVJRMzZqDTvFkam+9DCsQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>

--5Wc6MKp8FFRWMGhbgJwt0xgdFb1oDklP0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 07/01/17 09:57, Sergey Alyoshin (alyoshin DOT s AT gmail DOT com) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> I am not proposing to add just "a fork" in package description. The sim=
ilar
> user interface and identical to gEDA pcb package description would be c=
onfusing
> for new users. The new great appreciated features could have been denot=
ed in
> package description to ignite user interest.
+1


--5Wc6MKp8FFRWMGhbgJwt0xgdFb1oDklP0--

--VMiL3jEDFHks12Bx5afLJvk1AWATxKslm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=NS0S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--VMiL3jEDFHks12Bx5afLJvk1AWATxKslm--

- Raw text -