X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
	bh=c0RbHUaFdu3w3gAwNrixdHySqrOrAJ8I4VkNgpfDPDs=;
	b=Zr6wtx8EdV8dqnhx3y4YYYyRgRHjtIC2BGdiFJMEdBgOLSQmM79s1gzn/gFTPaLnpz
	qSw+AkzdkkBkR9ILJQBujYNQcHW4me4pc1zvxvimLc4IBbHnvWeAdiUntzgeR2drzWCy
	AZyMAZfuyYjIaxRghRIs4otM4hYIa6OsyAUV5n2C2x9uwtxHzXCa78stTawdiNBkDwUt
	8+D0flMEHd2cEroT18PzAYficInBlLWmi9yb///lP1Y+kXP1Hmf1vJr1rqfs8JbSjw1g
	Q3UOoFLZtw++h+UinrUA3tEi2Am6V+Um4DZ75di6DPubUJaQkcjHKuaWE5FF/7HoTPLl
	Pw+Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to;
	bh=c0RbHUaFdu3w3gAwNrixdHySqrOrAJ8I4VkNgpfDPDs=;
	b=pE6RT90cbdFTykTb2c6TEO09zh5vQij1Nu5STUOC4qlqGNyXCgwazc4rGI4KZPgGZ8
	5pYnAarTjJ8PutBOj9GJNs6w42z1cbWLOVt3CJFCUwwvw6MedUpniFBDfYMN4RO61Jab
	+e63YMGzwzo7vP+TWXTEt0E5egJodxIXwkyRxiYuI8A0xfWcG1j3ytcNLrLvz+jBL4bx
	NvgaEkFSUILxLLfyL1cypVlCjl2XSD0jKoekob5VhSoJmVdQKJVQiwxVvI9yhSdOb4xM
	J5qRfqLFyTNjTe6WGBs/l/yhdGcu6N03+wPmNrtROBlojy53QFMq+LUTKtrfjIKkmMQ8
	30yQ==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AIkVDXLTIPW1LnhhLUGu5dz3+4M68LZBGyYjnm/Wj54i8eQbDW9d+Emi2XorNbdPIijJ7i2FZlYr9jpRZL8e+w==
X-Received:	by 10.194.117.134 with SMTP id ke6mr56192074wjb.123.1483527115913;
	Wed, 04 Jan 2017 02:51:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<88b3e5e4-c237-108c-43b1-deb75a2e324a@mcmahill.net>
References:	<f1226321-a1f7-f46a-63c8-867024b13f87 AT mcmahill DOT net>
	<CAOxVtSScXqz0QMez+=DfNYA3pACD=QQgiT2uGJGcRCSFif4W9w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <88b3e5e4-c237-108c-43b1-deb75a2e324a AT mcmahill DOT net>
From:	"Sergey Alyoshin (alyoshin DOT s AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Wed, 4 Jan 2017 13:51:55 +0300
Message-ID:	<CAOxVtSQLmVar-Xgodc0X7xaOfOQqpQ-BNbQpvf-+dTBamQa09Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] pcb distcheck target fails from pcb-menu.res.h
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 2:23 AM, Dan McMahill (dan AT mcmahill DOT net) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> On 1/3/2017 2:43 PM, Sergey Alyoshin (alyoshin DOT s AT gmail DOT com) [via
> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 7:20 AM, Dan McMahill (dan AT mcmahill DOT net) [via
>> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I tried to run 'make distcheck' on pcb master today and found that there
>>> seems to be some broken stuff in src/Makefile.am related to menu resource
>>> file translations.
>>>
>>> One of the things 'make distcheck' does is to verify that you can build
>>> from
>>> outside the source tree with a read only source tree. pcb-menu.res.h gets
>>> generated and then we try to copy to $srcdir (this seems broken, we
>>> should
>>> not be writing back to $srcdir).  That of course fails but there is a
>>> hack
>>> in Makefile.am to get past that.  But the later on there are complaints
>>> that
>>> sub/src/pcb-menu.res.h and sub/src/gpcb-menu.res.h contain translations
>>> but
>>> weren't listed in POTFILES.in.  This is because what is listed in
>>> POTFILES.in is the *source* version, not the version which was generated
>>> in
>>> the build tree.  Are these .res.h files actually used?  It has been a few
>>> years since I last dug into the menu code.
>>
>>
>> Yes messages from *-menu.res.h are necessary and resulted in po/*.po
>>
>>> Does anyone know if the menu translation stuff actually works?  Was the
>>> goal
>>> to have translations for the default menus?
>>
>>
>> Menu is translated in commit 0a2a7efffbc3664ba14e75b479d9199ea2528a0
>> from origin/home/cparker/4.0.0
>>
>> src/*-menu.res.h after commit 91a528eff37a76518dec5d15cd03df8c7ee0969b
>> now listed both in po/POTFILES.in and in po/POTFILES.skip
>>
>> If src/*-menu.res.h are removed from po/POTFILES.in then all menu
>> strings is not translated.
>>
>
> oh, I see.  Those *-menu.res.h files are generated to the i18n tools can
> extract strings to go in the po files.  Then when the actual menus are
> parsed at run time, either from a file or compiled in defaults, they are
> translated.  That is why these files do not show up anywhere else.  Is this
> correct?

Yes, exactly.


> I think the handling of those files but the build system isn't quite right
> but that I can probably fix without breaking stuff.

- Raw text -