X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Recipient:	dj AT delorie DOT com
From:	geda AT psjt DOT org (Stephan =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=B6ttcher?=)
To:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
Cc:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] The nature of gEDA layers
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1601180756390 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
	<20160127091746 DOT 1c7a976c2752f913921688ac AT gmail DOT com>
	<s6npowne74w DOT fsf AT blaulicht DOT dmz DOT brux>
	<20160127141334 DOT c738feb9dbeb54a7dec3dff8 AT gmail DOT com>
	<s6n37tjt1tv DOT fsf AT falbala DOT ieap DOT uni-kiel DOT de>
	<56A8F74B DOT 8080304 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c9UKLsh5FAAwUMEtHThKH-w3gUmCU2i9dRW9igkyRt-TQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAJZxidDmjMtd_fKvR5qZVRa+hwDUbvfaz79oZjkBgDuE1m8RBg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<56A961BC DOT 3040405 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<CAJZxidC=nbxAinOtpfGHHqwPXbEMrhfat7jKgA9KBp3EVVg4_Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<s6nbn863xlu DOT fsf AT blaulicht DOT dmz DOT brux> <56A9E416 DOT 8080500 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<s6nfuxirm0b DOT fsf AT falbala DOT ieap DOT uni-kiel DOT de>
	<CAC4O8c9D-F3p8sAm2UumoE+uoMZM1ufSP=mNEPeHHpn8YrcSyg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20160128200126 DOT 0fe1bb26d5c28e59d56dfd0e AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c8prUS=NSm_7BCwkCPntsCRRMCMu9--eXXVBtD0C4pYOg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201601282134 DOT u0SLYET7002642 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<82868AE2-27A4-44AE-92F2-47A2FAA12BB4 AT icloud DOT com>
	<201601301603 DOT u0UG3D4E023424 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<2E50874E-7A17-4295-B95E-8A626EE9727B AT icloud DOT com>
	<201601301940 DOT u0UJeA0S032394 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Sat, 30 Jan 2016 22:09:40 +0100
In-Reply-To:	<201601301940.u0UJeA0S032394@envy.delorie.com> (DJ Delorie's
	message of "Sat, 30 Jan 2016 14:40:10 -0500")
Message-ID:	<s6nvb6aepuz.fsf@blaulicht.dmz.brux>
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> writes:

> Because this part:
>
>> why not provide a generic mechanism
>
> is harder than you think.

It will certainly not be easy.

I have no use for b/b vias.  But I see that a mechanism that supports
more generic vias may lead to a delevelopment that allows things I do
care about.

If somebody implements b/b vias in pcb, that code adds a lot of
complicated special cases to the program, and gains nothing but b/b
vias.  That can be done in reasonable time.  I won't care.

If a consensus will be reached to build a more generic foundation in the
data structures and continue to add features on top of that, I might
start hacking on pcb myself.  That path will be longer, but reach
farther.

-- 
Stephan

- Raw text -