X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=NSLGM2QuP94Y8QveRt+uB0MPbafYuAcs9oIWoBVDSHo=;
	b=PBYgxds9LFJX6VIclPIH6cBb3HxZg2zbj+KP+V3JzLXmHCIp9rgvRHRm9KPte5mhzX
	c9OyMyko7tQbhi7RDQT1VcGDWkvNQ9KqfoNyT7XhWPelujC9r7HGqvRy21/LE7LnBCkW
	+n/g7W/QMX2HwIo+1XyRSbsAWZQStlhmL3+pvqgYtWQxeWFYJh8+RGlX/2x7mCkKwvzv
	rZ0qpOmkzLKBe9iBzB73x+hS0+/B/cjdvI3/dbYf8S980ViTKUvWD3/FMKb+Dz5PWLK6
	XP4O0lMr9z9ZbSkBlQMPEQoZSlr+OUWIRfYDVuOatD9nWxIFmG1twalrOYZ1cG4SgXRj
	8sQg==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.182.245.167 with SMTP id xp7mr82871616obc.63.1452363721443;
	Sat, 09 Jan 2016 10:22:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:	<B7628CE0-70A1-4E3A-92E1-4E1D6B0B2BE2@sbcglobal.net>
References:	<B7628CE0-70A1-4E3A-92E1-4E1D6B0B2BE2 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
Date:	Sat, 9 Jan 2016 18:22:01 +0000
Message-ID:	<CAJXU7q9NGxMz+NETUau7jS8gDbmWSoRkJu-Scnoi==SJBbSMzw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Bus Junction Size
From:	"Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	gEDA User Mailing List <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

--001a11c2abe4b38f6b0528eac79a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 9 January 2016 at 17:49, Edward Hennessy (ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> It appears that the bus junction size is incorrect in gschem. Here is a
> screenshot and below is the source code. The bus and net sizes look
> reversed in the source code. If everyone is happy with the net junction
> size, I=E2=80=99m reluctant to swap them back.
>
> When I print, I scale down and target 17x11, and the nets are a bit small
> on paper.
>
> What are others experience?
>
> Ed
>

As far back as I can remember, people have been adjusting the cue drawing
in gschem. (And the grab handles too).

I don't even recall bus junction cue from way back when - perhaps they
never used to have them..

Peter

--001a11c2abe4b38f6b0528eac79a
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 9=
 January 2016 at 17:49, Edward Hennessy (<a href=3D"mailto:ehennes AT sbcgloba=
l.net">ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net</a>) [via <a href=3D"mailto:geda-user AT delorie.=
com">geda-user AT delorie DOT com</a>] <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:ged=
a-user AT delorie DOT com" target=3D"_blank">geda-user AT delorie DOT com</a>&gt;</span> =
wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8=
ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div style=3D"w=
ord-wrap:break-word"><div>It appears that the bus junction size is incorrec=
t in gschem. Here is a screenshot and below is the source code. The bus and=
 net sizes look reversed in the source code. If everyone is happy with the =
net junction size, I=E2=80=99m reluctant to swap them back.</div><div><br><=
/div><div>When I print, I scale down and target 17x11, and the nets are a b=
it small on paper.</div><div><br></div><div>What are others experience?</di=
v><div><br></div><div>Ed</div></div></blockquote><div><br><div>As far back =
as I can remember, people have been adjusting the cue drawing in gschem. (A=
nd the grab handles too).<br><br></div><div>I don&#39;t even recall bus jun=
ction cue from way back when - perhaps they never used to have them..<br><b=
r></div>Peter<br></div></div></div></div>

--001a11c2abe4b38f6b0528eac79a--

- Raw text -