X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=6KlC74sNLtdLIskAS6W8W7GwzFT9bDoBavLSllfYBBw=;
	b=AL0eBf65yo5U8xSDxbr/Ehl+BqzxZ8yu0p3lnGGKabRZ3XmplogbWjpFeGNGkZf1bX
	xYtShUXZrsaF1DeZ8HFD6DkEU1JPTX3HpaRgBiwSh6bE9hA4LqlJjeSyyfgYoXdqdQ+K
	d5pzuxQvXlc41eaDUf+LDc3+r7l8d3z5aaLGR3UJy/9iDETy3XYzXrKO1KNhOT9Yem/D
	QQ0ibp2ZDsEkJfdZdxQOcZVaX5R2mwHHXb59nCWA6CTR+4+0TTVO8j1J0jO5W/gg/mOi
	xLMUdAV/jge0TCGbhcE8HyDy7sDNSNKlFCQRJMgp2dzVnMRIphmJJInkwG/QlzwXCBhM
	4ntQ==
X-Received:	by 10.28.133.8 with SMTP id h8mr6598960wmd.71.1452033161493;
	Tue, 05 Jan 2016 14:32:41 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Tue, 5 Jan 2016 23:32:34 +0100
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Re: some more geometry module tweaks (nm maximum
	size)
Message-Id:	<20160105233234.bdd3c056655e420df5976a1c@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<201601052151.u05LpHrp007414@envy.delorie.com>
References:	<CAC4O8c-n4cHWum2MUzgDw=NLuKPK395xp_F24cSyoXhnADRskw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512230503390 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
	<CAC4O8c8A271d5unQWRV=PoaEsJECgZt33Wy16uCnK6D+4LCzww AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512260402081 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
	<CAC4O8c-49Fn191KT-p0hXi1jXW=OeTSaNUh11pLmBQYHeGtyoA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512310512510 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
	<CAC4O8c8Or1FS=x18C7Zv5uu+dUOXX2My4K+njsoufNeotm_CBQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201601052151 DOT u05LpHrp007414 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> > I agree, but we may have different ideas of what the fix would be.  If you
> > want to stop using floating point entirely, it's a huge effort, and ints
> > won't do what you want either, you need rationals.
> 
> We use nanometers, I think that's as fixed-point as we need to get :-)

Maximum size ?

Float have the nice property number os significant bits are the same regardless of decimal point position and the large range but size of circuit is probably rather well defined even if someone make such small things as integrated circuits.

- Raw text -