X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-TCPREMOTEIP:	63.119.35.194
X-Authenticated-UID:	jpd AT noqsi DOT com
Mime-Version:	1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Antifork
From:	John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<201508231649.t7NGnoM0029940@envy.delorie.com>
Date:	Sun, 23 Aug 2015 18:54:08 -0400
Message-Id:	<DA3A081C-C207-43E3-A70F-3DD12E68B440@noqsi.com>
References:	<55D8D8B8 DOT 7050907 AT jump-ing DOT de> <20150822230549 DOT 3750 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <55D9A5AE DOT 9090604 AT jump-ing DOT de> <C2FC0AF3-DFDB-4799-87F7-039614405DCD AT noqsi DOT com> <201508231649 DOT t7NGnoM0029940 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer:	Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t7NMsE9d028212
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Aug 23, 2015, at 12:49 PM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> 
>>> Ask Eagle or KiCAD users; they consider gEDA to be mostly dead,
>>> because there's no visible development and newer developments also
>>> don't get into Linux distributions.
>> 
>> Why should we listen to people who don't understand how a toolkit works?
> 
> Because they're right.
> 

Baloney. They’re like people who expect Ornette Coleman to sound like Mozart. Nothing wrong with either, but they do not sound the same. If you think Eagle or KiCAD users are right, why don’t you join them?

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com

- Raw text -