X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=mail.ud03.udmedia.de; h=
	message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=beta; bh=
	+lS7Hb4ZxKS3DHJaPphmp16L6aJczzO/5t0nOklZHq4=; b=NFSuJL2dN8Ors2q0
	wRkUKHTzCAv2c1S9KUUT3VCSKMFptdlElTs0RdKtR/IsxaEnfvkE31KUB2iXRczq
	lZyfGHb5nANxhfBnWBXHmlD/GN7Q4Lo9WiwhtQ4+03uREkj0Qr9lOswE8XidZPbD
	Uq6qQcelidP1HyQnkZ8O+prx4hk=
Message-ID:	<55D9D019.6040305@jump-ing.de>
Date:	Sun, 23 Aug 2015 15:52:25 +0200
From:	"Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Antifork
References:	<55D8D8B8 DOT 7050907 AT jump-ing DOT de> <CAM2RGhSZ1vi_DFKqZdZYxhto4ZaXLLscBt5m5kk+PH2ZoYW_vw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508230609370 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <55D9BDC7 DOT 4000608 AT jump-ing DOT de> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508231450350 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1508231450350.6924@igor2priv>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

Am 23.08.2015 um 15:06 schrieb gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu:

>> pcb-rnd means to replace pcb, you can use only one of both.
> 
> What exactly does make you think that?

As said, one user can use only one of both. Using pcb-rnd means to abandon pcb and vice versa. One can switch 10 times a days, of course, still they're exclusive.

It's wishful thinking of yours to simply show up on the list here for taking all gEDA/pcb users with you. You forked and one ineviteable result of such a fork is that you start with exactly one user and exactly one developer: yourself.

> So please fix it.

I'm not responsible for fulfilling your wishlist.

> I think the major problems on this is total lack of a working team
> with coherent and well defined goals and the DVCS.

It's in the nature of free software that there is no way to enforce what users want and what developers work on. If there was such a means, it wouldn't be free.

> And I still consider it a fail that you need scripts just to keep
> track of the forks that happen in the official VCS.

It's the behaviour of people like you which make this script neccessary. You complain about yourself.

And no, antifork doesn't track the official repo, it tracks forks outside of it. In a user selected way, so these 100+ branches in these 20+ forks don't clobber up the local clone.


Markus

-- 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter
http://www.jump-ing.de/

- Raw text -