www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: geda-user/2015/08/05/20:40:58

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=Q3uNCy/Vw3MHSnpTaem5o6UIGV9Z6+XZy076pbJxxt8=;
b=wPu6H5RAsa4Ji3NitiDfMoBAF6xQmTUpUgVUrsFJKaa6v0cHXrn/3ubm7B6Xgz9XoZ
wThoFXINpr4XWcHZJaZUpvaRacWoF9rgKiyc5IA6zA2Y5DguVN5A35ah1K3OwmP3gNW1
OQRvV9c1mFOzWcDV6vlRdBC/3jMFVFR/bvLTEr3tLPH9jNvLLStfYvSjOSt0IPWqZp37
V7sF0cgaVOV/u3Kgq5rtnA+MLLm0vF1EKVP8NLu/G0BTHCumLVx+2xwdLkJoXv5x+jlP
3MsjauT6fnC7NEz+mutSpkhb834TVKEp0AenAAzXyoljH5lim148jkybfpTlfUoC5l4V
+UWQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.12.233 with SMTP id b9mr12032632lbc.91.1438821651853;
Wed, 05 Aug 2015 17:40:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3CA1F410-AE98-4F43-8DFC-C3671A4A4B90@noqsi.com>
References: <818820A7-34E1-4EE3-B043-992FA380ED01 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
<mpor01$v3h$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
<3043CCB2-68EE-4CC4-BDAD-C5DBB035070B AT sbcglobal DOT net>
<3CA1F410-AE98-4F43-8DFC-C3671A4A4B90 AT noqsi DOT com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 00:40:51 +0000
Message-ID: <CAM2RGhQW9Mr2DaZRUAuwJMrwL+jNggyt932u_Aj1ci9vMKB4uQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Find Text Mechanism
From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t760etAx005210
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 4:24 PM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:
>
> On Aug 4, 2015, at 11:54 AM, Edward Hennessy (ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>> What about providing two dialogs for searching? One pop-up dialog with all the checkboxes. The second dialog is docked, like the one in source control now, but with no checkboxes. But, the second one uses the same settings the user selected in the first dialog.
>
> Every such option provides one more way for the user to waste time lost in GUI. One of the most wonderful features of gschem compared to commercial offerings has been that it minimizes such distractions.

Seconded. Having to dialog boxes for two different search mechanisms
would be a mess.

> John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
> http://www.noqsi.com/
> jpd AT noqsi DOT com
>
>
>



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019