X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<54CCFB3D.2080306@think-open.at>
Date:	Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:56:45 +0100
From:	Bernhard Kraft <kraftb AT think-open DOT at>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<CAOFvGD4OxiFm3f9w1hp5BuKQJBQgyf6s14G3ESUWo20_ivdSPg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAOFvGD4OxiFm3f9w1hp5BuKQJBQgyf6s14G3ESUWo20_ivdSPg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score:	-2.9
X-Spam_score_int:	-28
X-Spam_bar:	--
X-Spam_report:	Spam detection software, running on the system "think-open.at", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email. If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

 Content preview:  Hi, On 2015-01-31 15:40, Jason White wrote: > That might be
    convenient, but I think it could be a bit of a "trap" so > to speak. If you
    have large currents flowing from the re-flooded > "hole" in the copper pour,
    you may not realize that their is an > electrically poor connection (a single
    via) to the actual plane. [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
  0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP            Message was received from an IP address
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                             [score: 0.0000]
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 89.104.9.138
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kraftb AT think-open DOT at
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on think-open.at
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_20,
	TVD_RCVD_IP autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Re: Ground Plane Behavior?
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.think-open.at)

Hi,

On 2015-01-31 15:40, Jason White wrote:

> That might be convenient, but I think it could be a bit of a "trap" so
> to speak. If you have large currents flowing from the re-flooded
> "hole" in the copper pour, you may not realize that their is an
> electrically poor connection (a single via) to the actual plane.

True. Thats something I didn't think of. In such a situation I would 
place quite a few vias next to each other to allows the required amount 
of current. But if one doesn't take care about this he could surely burn 
a via.


greetings,
Bernhard
-- 
Wer nicht gelegentlich auch einmal kausalwidrige Dinge zu denken vermag,
wird seine Wissenschaft nie um eine neue Idee bereichern können.
Max Planck (1858-1947)

- Raw text -