X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer:	exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 (debian 1:2.7.2-18) with nmh-1.3
X-Exmh-Isig-CompType:	repl
X-Exmh-Isig-Folder:	inbox
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Should uCtlr symbols have mutable attributes reflecting pinmux? Discuss.
In-reply-to:	<51E5B2AD.1020402@sonic.net>
References:	<51E5B2AD DOT 1020402 AT sonic DOT net>
Comments:	In-reply-to Dave Curtis <davecurtis AT sonic DOT net>
	message dated "Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:53:01 -0700."
Mime-Version:	1.0
Message-Id:	<20130920144255.928688043C48@turkos.aspodata.se>
Date:	Fri, 20 Sep 2013 16:42:54 +0200 (CEST)
From:	karl AT aspodata DOT se (Karl Hammar)
X-Virus-Scanned:	ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Dave Curtis, 16 Jul:
> Modern microcontrollers typically have several functions that can be 
> brought out to each pin, under control of some pin routing registers.   
> Typically, I've used a pinlabel such as:
> 
> pinlabel=PD5 (PCINT21/OC0B/T1)
> 
> which shows the canonical GPIO name, plus other possible functions in 
> parens afterwards.
> 
> A few days ago I was showing a friend (a KiCAD user) the output from the 
> symbol generator that I am working on, and he asked if there was a way 
> to make the pinlabel reflect the actual pin function as deployed in the 
> application, and lose all the other stuff.
...

If you are writing a symbol generator, wouldn't the simplest solution
be to make a new symbol.

I'm doing something similar with my pintosym.pl script.
See 

 http://turkos.aspodata.se/git/openhw/pdftosym/examples.pintosym/

for examples.

Regards,
/Karl Hammar

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aspö Data
Lilla Aspö 148
S-742 94 Östhammar
Sweden
+46 173 140 57

- Raw text -