www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: geda-user/2013/09/03/14:24:58

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
From: Peter TB Brett <peter AT peter-b DOT co DOT uk>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] New icons for gschem
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 19:23:57 +0100
Lines: 67
Message-ID: <874na169xe.fsf@harrington.peter-b.co.uk>
References: <5d79ad6f58d01f4f3f604a5a204aaa85 AT mail DOT theimps DOT com>
<1378123197 DOT 2185 DOT 11 DOT camel AT AMD64X2>
<87li3evrbz DOT fsf AT harrington DOT peter-b DOT co DOT uk>
<1378159841 DOT 31945 DOT 18 DOT camel AT AMD64X2>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT ger DOT gmane DOT org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc4-oxfd23-2-0-cust628.4-3.cable.virginmedia.com
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VKPCu/A6PTafbY9apXR5SrQVkWM=
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Stefan Salewski writes:

> On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 22:36 +0100, Peter TB Brett wrote:
>> Stefan Salewski writes:
> [...]
>>=20
>> Well, it may take some time until I get to PCB, let alone gerbv -- one
>> thing at a time!
> Of course -- indeed I hope someone other than you may do it -- it should
> not need really programming skills. And it is not so difficult when
> there exist some well looking examples. I myself am absolutely not an
> artist -- but maybe other gEDA users are. I looked at the inkscape icons
> long time ago, they have shadows to look nice. It may even be necessary
> to test the final icons with different color schemes and different OS --
> I am not sure.
> [...]

I have been carefully following the GNOME icon style guide (and, to a
lesser extent, the Tango icon style guide).  There are lots of nice
gradients and subtle shadings. ;-)  Also there are indeed shadows on the
larger (22x22) variants.

>> Transitioning to GTK+ 3.x will be a huge hassle.  It really is quite
>> hostile to multi-key keybindings, for example...
>>
> That is really sad. My personal view is, that we do not need multi-key
> keybindings for EDA tools, because the set of actions is limited, and
> most people do not like it. I am using VIM and GVIM for one year now --
> it uses multi-key keybindings much, it is OK for me, and it is justified
> because of the large set of available actions. Of course people
> customize to gschems multi-key interface may want very strongly to keep
> it.
>

I think that multi-key bindings are actually very important.  In Emacs,
I like the use of complex keystrokes -- but in Emacs, I have both hands
on the keyboard.  When using a CAD program I have one hand on the mouse
and one hand on the keyboard, and I find that pressing a succession of
single keys is more comfortable, especially during long editing
sessions.  I keep meaning to design a gschem keymap that's optimised for on=
ly
using the left hand side of a Dvorak keyboard... maybe next time I have
to do a complicated design in gEDA!

I certainly wouldn't be particularly keen on transitioning to GTK3 if it
meant giving up binding to key sequences. :-(

                       Peter

=2D-=20
Dr Peter Brett <peter AT peter-b DOT co DOT uk>

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlImKT0ACgkQZ7Gbq7g7vpr+DACfTEJJbYQPmjTMWN5qE/JGeMpO
caYAn1ctCUJ7pPlYtiBEDg7Z3VWRfNkr
=xat/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019