X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Authority-Analysis:	v=2.0 cv=Du3UCRD+ c=1 sm=0 a=6jktZp3dcHAl1vye2O6wCg==:17 a=jl9P3j1e7_0A:10 a=wniM0YfUJoQA:10 a=oQDvWQo6hwEA:10 a=6WB07kdHjWAA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=wR-FlJDvAAAA:8 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=RME7Cwcw2aEA:10 a=4AtYHsxDAAAA:8 a=p5Zxw5dPXY9tduL6TlEA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=qXbWks-U9W4A:10 a=6jktZp3dcHAl1vye2O6wCg==:117
X-Cloudmark-Score:	0
X-Authenticated-User:
X-Originating-IP:	70.113.67.117
Message-ID:	<51CA2655.1000907@ecosensory.com>
Date:	Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:23:01 -0500
From:	John Griessen <john AT ecosensory DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] 3D modelling and gEDA
References:	<CAK=z9GWkMwS3NiLEgpvWuPgBVrGB+sHqb7DLCgYZTC3C1OyLSg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <51B6CDB6 DOT 1010909 AT estechnical DOT co DOT uk> <51B6DB0E DOT 8000108 AT prochac DOT sk> <CAK=z9GUWzhidWQsvxhWqYpSnyvUnmsut1+gatrMVvJqMM6L_UA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <kpfolc$gma$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <51BBA5E7 DOT 4040006 AT prochac DOT sk> <CAM2RGhQD-xY9dB37+Z-pkDwRQBrqv1aOew9a2W-J1n2g00Gdew AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1371329763 DOT 11314 DOT 10 DOT camel AT pcjc2lap> <4DFFE27A-47A1-41DB-98CC-490E1AB6085A AT jump-ing DOT de> <20130617012721 DOT 01e56f87 AT akka> <51C48E65 DOT 10508 AT prochac DOT sk> <CAM2RGhR2Ef9xYcC=PUf6SzruVD0C8vFTQ3U1+Bhb95ft3Nqk+w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <kq28fn$5g1$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <CAM2RGhQXUr8vFzL867wWowRFpvLx-xc9F9sX6dH-afamQMosTw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <kq2jls$k0q$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <CAM2RGhTWQNMezQxZo=VZtRWHd0jBmHQ=9MNQ_5LEdSA=EkW0rA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAM2RGhTs5_3ZCOEmF3Z9tMgxTJWmVLU=3nzU-_O4ThsL7yipzg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <51C5BC66 DOT 6050308 AT ecosensory DOT com> <6C92EC8D-2A12-4E1B-8C08-C2812F4DBAD3 AT jump-ing DOT de> <51C7833C DOT 4080108 AT ecosensory DOT com> <kq81mh$7di$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
In-Reply-To:	<kq81mh$7di$1@ger.gmane.org>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 06/23/2013 06:51 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> STEP, hands down.
> It is reasonable feature complete. It is. . . . .. . .
> Only downside is, that STEP is a behemoth of a format. About the
> extreme opposite of the PCB format;-)   Some time back I hade a
> cursory glance at how it does basic 3Dgeometry. Afterwards, I knew,
> why kicad or eagle developers chose VRML for their 3D ambitions.

What about this:

http://stepcode.org/mw/index.php?title=How_to_use_STEPcode_in_an_application

meanwhile, back to studying openscad again.

- Raw text -