X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane:	http://gmane.org/
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
From:	Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] 3D modelling and gEDA
Date:	Sat, 22 Jun 2013 02:34:03 +0200
Lines:	25
Message-ID:	<kq2rdn$nve$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:	<CAK=z9GWkMwS3NiLEgpvWuPgBVrGB+sHqb7DLCgYZTC3C1OyLSg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <51B6CDB6 DOT 1010909 AT estechnical DOT co DOT uk> <51B6DB0E DOT 8000108 AT prochac DOT sk> <CAK=z9GUWzhidWQsvxhWqYpSnyvUnmsut1+gatrMVvJqMM6L_UA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <kpfolc$gma$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <51BBA5E7 DOT 4040006 AT prochac DOT sk> <CAM2RGhQD-xY9dB37+Z-pkDwRQBrqv1aOew9a2W-J1n2g00Gdew AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1371329763 DOT 11314 DOT 10 DOT camel AT pcjc2lap> <4DFFE27A-47A1-41DB-98CC-490E1AB6085A AT jump-ing DOT de> <20130617012721 DOT 01e56f87 AT akka> <51C48E65 DOT 10508 AT prochac DOT sk> <CAM2RGhR2Ef9xYcC=PUf6SzruVD0C8vFTQ3U1+Bhb95ft3Nqk+w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <kq28fn$5g1$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <CAM2RGhQXUr8vFzL867wWowRFpvLx-xc9F9sX6dH-afamQMosTw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <kq2jls$k0q$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <CAM2RGhTWQNMezQxZo=VZtRWHd0jBmHQ=9MNQ_5LEdSA=EkW0rA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT ger DOT gmane DOT org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host:	a89-182-164-48.net-htp.de
User-Agent:	KNode/4.4.11
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

Evan Foss wrote:

> As for BRL Cad's age. It has managed to hold onto it's google summer
> of code participation. As to the user interface complaints many
> people say the same thing about gEDA 

The UI of both, gschem and PCB is basically point-and-click. So this 
is no news to any computer literate these days. Yes, there are a few 
pecularities, in particular with gschem. But these are very minor 
compared to getting started with brlcad. Notice, how fast DJ Delories 
tutorial gets you up to speed with the LED board. 


> and we are not talking about
> using it out right, we are talking about interfacing too it.

To be actually useful, you'd have to use the mechanical CAD 
application in on its own turf. A library of components needs to be 
done, the mechanical design which the electronics should fit in needs 
to be modelled. Consequently, I'd put a premium on usability of the 
mechanical CAD.

---<)kaimartin(>---
-- 
Kai-Martin Knaak

- Raw text -