X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Recipient:	dj AT delorie DOT com
MIME-Version:	1.0
Date:	Tue, 10 Oct 2023 13:43:20 +0200
From:	"mhx AT iae DOT nl [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Cc:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] is geda dead yet?
In-Reply-To:	<xnzg0rum7l.fsf@envy.delorie.com>
References:	<xnzg0rum7l DOT fsf AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Message-ID:	<3e25be6648117d749ad507b57abf9b5e@iae.nl>
X-Sender:	mhx AT iae DOT nl
ClaraMail2-Webmail-AuthUser:	mhx AT iae DOT nl
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 2023-10-10 06:37, DJ Delorie wrote:
> "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]"
> <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> writes:
>> Well I still use it
> 
> I appreciate that there are still some users of these programs, but
> without developers, they will quickly become unusable as distros 
> upgrade
> toolkits and geda starts failing to build.
> 
> Users of gschem and pcb are probably best served by switching to one of
> the forks, like lepton and pcb-rnd, which have active development.

I am also using it, although it is quite difficult to build on 
Windows/WSL.
The SPICE side is my single interest: I only need the schematic entry
interface, printing, and the symbol library.

-marcel

- Raw text -