X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
	h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject
	:date:message-id:reply-to;
	bh=T+sHn9LDOTkW9IGvvkcsYhHvBnpqguUAtvGj0Nu4ecw=;
	b=dAdFdH11/GHp041avJZ/C9/4SMb5uL5gyKCSMy3zDwY9IxgK/4EWaLH+6jAqzNtV10
	laZjL6Wm9IxGYbTQEF8vNyr+HZnJjR3O0NOWEMiwLU/nUqjOOD+xbEZUV0+9IqOe0xHG
	xO2B/lWUNHNDK4x/CHWK3PGR3qrQ1ymCCD6rp+MUgtb01cvtJEJdifF/xyvRC9dVrMWr
	OGJOcuTR6f+RYpFgvO6dKLxwXyAHw7Bic3s8JnxGIxprS0cf321ed2+MiDYwbupJ7vkZ
	+473QCg714u/iGuVSjFh96cAS9qNZeyCfV/ZuBw3RNs5me1ukKz1fY25PHkobgFQCfMS
	sr6A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
	h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state
	:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
	bh=T+sHn9LDOTkW9IGvvkcsYhHvBnpqguUAtvGj0Nu4ecw=;
	b=XAOzK2Ulm4jqM50aWtHAzM8p/d5WgLI/IzcNYUEoFouwWgi/1FdWaGWJP5+cg5TcOL
	yomntyQbsG+qt0/xWGTAcJPJA18GGCmQA1H/0ng8kIGgJ+scCUFk6KYWwp+ZNDZjFCTF
	1zEnKCNbtXL70ouDs+lTijlo7i6rqAY21uBtYWtOiPfjeor41pnIPJ/kamifxRWJQNes
	wXLjRNywKcpd70dLR/bbbP6w6p1WBECCDSk9T6RRlncp2ddCVXbUB+kTPWNx6Hnrji2Q
	hnUKahgnOns05WEnwSBQ+TnkFw5cEgcJQVkIZS8qgeUXQUN6aQJ8WgXJ27o5kVhAtpbt
	1pFQ==
X-Gm-Message-State:	ANoB5plRDxLQ13CzsDoinc9vcSo80Fw73S8Jd301D7qP5zO/b1aLIPp1
	RKm6AUijw5MWC4P/34Jwnv6Uw31dS/7BQkXpAfNlNEXrcfE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source:	AA0mqf57UybjkZ77LyDKicUdh05AYQ+PbHoNDJdKD3ho+YbJUsSF+0yQ0l9BqUI1C7Qq3DVwozogL2GuVk9CBsbhr48=
X-Received:	by 2002:a17:906:f896:b0:7bb:cdd8:94e7 with SMTP id
	lg22-20020a170906f89600b007bbcdd894e7mr30126402ejb.369.1669936129856; Thu, 01
	Dec 2022 15:08:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version:	1.0
From:	"Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Thu, 1 Dec 2022 14:08:38 -0900
Message-ID:	<CAC4O8c_CK84C-47sK3hNjJTbxOmo7N-dPaQK-FRFvq4RmKpehg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	[geda-user] more questions about latest geda/pcb and Import Schematics under
	latest geda/pcb
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

The fix Roland suggested previously didn't work for me but since he's
clearly on the right track I tried building both geda-gaf-1.10.2 and
pcb-4.3.0 into a common prefix ~/opt/geda_pcb_common.  It seems that
Import Schematics works again after that.

There are a couple questions/bugs/issues I ran into:

* I notice pcb has the --with-gaf-datadir option to it's ./configure.
Does this perhaps need to be set to point to some subdir of the prefix
under which geda is installed if it's different than pcb?

* I used ./configure --prefix=new_common_prefix in the geda source
tree while it was still dirty from my original install, and then on
make install there was a weird complaint from xorn that it couldn't
install into something that looked like it still had the old prefix
there.  Maybe ./configure isn't even supposed to support changing
--prefix that way, I'm not sure.  I nuked the source dir and started
over from that .tar.gz and it worked.

* A lot of scary warning were displayed when pcb first started:

;;; note: auto-compilation is enabled, set GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0
;;;       or pass the --no-auto-compile argument to disable.
;;; compiling /home/bkerin/opt/geda_pcb_both_latest_as_of_20221201/share/gEDA/scheme/geda.scm
;;; compiling /home/bkerin/opt/geda_pcb_both_latest_as_of_20221201/share/gEDA/scheme/geda/os.scm
;;; compiled /home/bkerin/.cache/guile/ccache/2.0-LE-8-2.0/home/bkerin/opt/geda_pcb_both_latest_as_of_20221201/share/gEDA/scheme/geda/os.scm.go
;;; compiled /home/bkerin/.cache/guile/ccache/2.0-LE-8-2.0/home/bkerin/opt/geda_pcb_both_latest_as_of_20221201/share/gEDA/scheme/geda.scm.go
;;; compiling /home/bkerin/opt/geda_pcb_both_latest_as_of_20221201/share/gEDA/scheme/geda-deprecated-config.scm
;;; compiled /home/bkerin/.cache/guile/ccache/2.0-LE-8-2.0/home/bkerin/opt/geda_pcb_both_latest_as_of_20221201/share/gEDA/scheme/geda-deprecated-config.scm.go
;;; compiling /home/bkerin/opt/geda_pcb_both_latest_as_of_20221201/share/gEDA/scheme/color-map.scm
;;; compiled /home/bkerin/.cache/guile/ccache/2.0-LE-8-2.0/home/bkerin/opt/geda_pcb_both_latest_as_of_20221201/share/gEDA/scheme/color-map.scm.go
;;; compiling /home/bkerin/opt/geda_pcb_both_latest_as_of_20221201/share/gEDA/scheme/gnetlist.scm
;;; gnetlist.scm:37:13: warning: possibly unbound variable
`gnetlist:get-verbosity'
;;; gnetlist.scm:49:32: warning: possibly unbound variable
`gnetlist:get-backend-arguments'
;;; gnetlist.scm:149:17: warning: possibly unbound variable
`gnetlist:get-all-package-attributes'
;;; gnetlist.scm:172:4: warning: possibly unbound variable
`gnetlist:get-all-package-attributes'
;;; gnetlist.scm:206:6: warning: possibly unbound variable `gnetlist:get-pins'
;;; gnetlist.scm:224:6: warning: possibly unbound variable `all-pins'
;;; gnetlist.scm:339:22: warning: possibly unbound variable
`get-attrib-value-by-attrib-name'
;;; compiled /home/bkerin/.cache/guile/ccache/2.0-LE-8-2.0/home/bkerin/opt/geda_pcb_both_latest_as_of_20221201/share/gEDA/scheme/gnetlist.scm.go

I guess these are all not a concern and are normal the first time
compilation completes?

* The first time Import Schematics is used this warning appears:

;;; gnet-pcbfwd.scm:123:4: warning: possibly unbound variable `packages'

Hopefully this is likewise not a concern?

Thanks for and advice,
Britton

- Raw text -