| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
| X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailer: | exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 (debian 1:2.8.0-6) with |
| X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: | repl |
| X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: | inbox |
| From: | karl AT aspodata DOT se |
| To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| Subject: | Re: [geda-user] pin drill and thickness statistics from cvs.gedasymbols.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20180114202623.3E2608076F36@turkos.aspodata.se> |
| References: | <20180114202623 DOT 3E2608076F36 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> |
| Comments: | In-reply-to karl AT aspodata DOT se |
| message dated "Sun, 14 Jan 2018 21:26:23 +0100." | |
| Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
| Message-Id: | <20180126023122.C420B8076F4C@turkos.aspodata.se> |
| Date: | Fri, 26 Jan 2018 03:31:22 +0100 (CET) |
| X-Virus-Scanned: | ClamAV using ClamSMTP |
| Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
Do theese thickness diameters look reasonable ?
all values in mm
c = small/tight
b = hopefully something normal
a = something somewhat big
aa = big thickness
hole c b a aa
0.3 0.8 1.0 1.2 2.5
0.4 0.9 1.1 1.3 2.7
0.5 1.0 1.3 1.5 2.9
0.6 1.1 1.4 1.6 3.0
0.7 1.2 1.5 1.8 3.2
0.8 1.3 1.7 2.0 3.4
0.9 1.4 1.8 2.1 3.5
1.0 1.5 1.9 2.3 3.7
1.1 1.6 2.1 2.4 3.9
1.2 1.7 2.2 2.6 4.1
1.3 1.8 2.3 2.7 4.2
1.4 1.9 2.4 2.9 4.4
1.5 2.0 2.6 3.0 4.6
1.6 2.1 2.7 3.2 4.7
1.7 2.2 2.8 3.4 4.9
1.8 2.3 3.0 3.5 5.1
1.9 2.4 3.1 3.7 5.3
2.0 2.5 3.2 3.8 5.4
2.1 2.6 3.4 4.0 5.6
2.2 2.7 3.5 4.1 5.8
2.3 2.8 3.6 4.3 5.9
2.4 2.9 3.8 4.4 6.1
2.5 3.0 3.9 4.6 6.3
2.6 3.1 4.0 4.8 6.5
2.7 3.2 4.2 4.9 6.6
2.8 3.3 4.3 5.1 6.8
2.9 3.4 4.4 5.2 7.0
3.0 3.5 4.6 5.4 7.1
3.1 3.6 4.7 5.5 7.3
3.2 3.7 4.8 5.7 7.5
3.3 3.8 5.0 5.8 7.7
each column is
thickness = a0 + a1 * hole_dia
a0 a1
c: 0.2662 1.0966
b: 0.6041 1.3211
a: 2.0090 1.7107
aa: 0.7195 1.5476
I got theese by the procedure outlined in
http://aspodata.se/git/openhw/share/pcb/data_from_cvs.gedasymbols.org/readme.txt
///
Loocking at https://www.samtec.com/support/pcb-hole-sizes I get much
tighter values: 0.130 1.011
///
Does IPC have any recommendation about this ?
Regards,
/Karl Hammar
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aspö Data
Lilla Aspö 148
S-742 94 Östhammar
Sweden
+46 173 140 57
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |