X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Thu, 16 Feb 2017 04:02:53 +0100 (CET)
X-X-Sender:	igor2 AT igor2priv
To:	"Bert Timmerman (bert DOT timmerman AT xs4all DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Debug:	to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From:	gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] RFC feedback on release pcb-4.0.0 requested
In-Reply-To:	<58A4AFF5.3040008@xs4all.nl>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1702160357370.7286@igor2priv>
References:	<58A4AFF5 DOT 3040008 AT xs4all DOT nl>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, 15 Feb 2017, Bert Timmerman (bert DOT timmerman AT xs4all DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:

> Hello list members,
>
> It has been almost a month to this day that a new release of pcb was done.
>
> In this month there have been some 709 downloads of the tarball.
>
> What we active developers would like to have feedback on is:
>
> 1) how many list members have downloaded the tarball ?
>
>  (0 or +1 suffices)

+1

>
> 2) how many list members have tried to build an run the new version of pcb ?
>
>  (0 or +1 suffices)

+1

>
> 3) what was your user experience ? (what went good, what went bad, what was 
> the first impression after test driving, etc.).
>
>  (you can put the whole rant here ;-)

My usage is very limited: I use it as a "reference implementation" 
(cheking bugs reported on pcb-rnd against mainline). On this non-tipical 
use case, I didn't experience difference in either the better or 
worse direction compared to the last snapshot.

Regards,

Igor2

- Raw text -