X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Scanned:	amavisd-new at neurotica.com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=neurotica.com;
	s=default; t=1484325416;
	bh=m+wk/t8tfwPD0lhf9X3nP7Udaw1wpyA2E+qy6rBCFqM=;
	h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To;
	b=GPIJG1D0IgNL3vgNZ0UwDTn/Vo2yzDjJyjXI9rnhQ8j+Xj3MlRvta6hylxHC6Ug1j
	rvZdkPkq0QzzyYuBxgkKcQkOwkIx5sLpAaEyetw2jKQIRUC1RNOoBNiSQdZnWIrDoA
	71ykxlPWasiBe43IcTJPm31b0ueT7UrtEzgtmr8c=
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] made with gEDA
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<39216e8d-00d4-29c9-56e6-8ae22fe81833 AT neurotica DOT com>
	<CAJXU7q-qtfNiqe-VuYK+k81PR7cTN2XaJWtxXk3uPzjjm5+TgQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<ac6764d4-3c77-baf6-5df8-d3f46c4660c9 AT neurotica DOT com>
	<CAJXU7q9SPFrVee5CjdVjvWsyCetrVEb56Y1ocZfy-9_CWLnUhQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
From:	"Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Message-ID:	<b23ba540-114a-9a44-f22e-7e6eb92c63f8@neurotica.com>
Date:	Fri, 13 Jan 2017 11:36:55 -0500
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAJXU7q9SPFrVee5CjdVjvWsyCetrVEb56Y1ocZfy-9_CWLnUhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 01/13/2017 10:57 AM, Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com)
[via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>       It would be great to get that upstreamed, and maybe even into pcb-rnd.
>      It looks like there's a huge amount of very good development happening
>     on that project.  As soon as there's transparency support, I'll be on
>     that like white on rice. :)
> 
> 
> Transparency support where, pcb-rnd?

  Yeah.

> Not sure when that might happen.. one of Igor's original stated reasons
> for forking was to rip out the (optional) upstream support for opengl
> which I added.

  Well, we'll see.  It's the only thing keeping me from running it now.

> Sure, there are other ways to achieve transparency but they are likely
> to be slower than opengl.

  Yes.

> Out of curiosity, which repository / branch / age / renderer are you
> currently running?

  The one with the additions you made to support the soldermask keep-outs.

             -Dave

-- 
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA

- Raw text -