X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=YT9oEiWcF3VHIWBU6TGjvmzr610XGJkH4szAYzunG/k=;
	b=hd31+nH0O3Sh56knH/OpUfc8h3Q96U2K5gWreXfbK8t8nQrba6Z3OoqyO/3qBTMmK6
	RUzGisrub5nzLoxumvK3oTED6WekP+y3kLD7N6cqpJ9cjBxdVp4gO5CeOVBO9Ehtt1Ku
	/mFtq55it6FmIBuMoOfpu7hnpR2WSYNQQuCBJ5WeWKFEyOsQJxm+35PvhpsErShzEkhg
	Stwziq22Ggo6jgxubi7K+V6D2DYEW05Xc5qvhGHwy8jZBHcnBZ1mkuxbxdUJZP4pUy6a
	WYplCUV7x4I+BjdUseYZOJAUdvf2EintiPOaHKhYGlhO6iVCVOLEVP8eaznZ4wNfQQQN
	zZAw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=YT9oEiWcF3VHIWBU6TGjvmzr610XGJkH4szAYzunG/k=;
	b=B/xV9VmIvp33QCpcx8+rke5oqDmKKDJEKobOJUIhy8bB+nCt/RYyh1DVLSFwqFEcY2
	Kac0ps/1swtlVdo9bPOlcf9hOAwWAzRXGTXNNGR9vE7fmR4GwO4GZ5Aa0xbRHdDJrTWd
	kBs+GvI6PH3Cpj9AXR7bYMboEJ0cotIVPPHpJZfIDQvV/9QGMqG3c5M2rZR0A2H0RR8m
	1EpPzPRuL3kdQUuEymEmfSH18A53IfHELFLy4492MWGGLnD7Xhu4LLYvcBdu8VRt8+a7
	wVe/aH6VGFn+fx0sTzNe+I0RDUj3dqOkny3+1msMMTIlrS978PZv27dwPcUP5QnVnG8A
	FG9Q==
X-Gm-Message-State:	ABUngveLzE4Akmb5RHjGIkVxMKD4UuCfamYy+2dQ/QAB+i4d8h1p19H1x0StE6A4IF/w1Q==
X-Received:	by 10.25.43.12 with SMTP id r12mr9229994lfr.104.1478665621203;
	Tue, 08 Nov 2016 20:27:01 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Wed, 9 Nov 2016 07:26:48 +0300
From:	"(graahnul DOT grom AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Annoying object selection behaviour in gschem >
	1.6.2
Message-ID:	<20161109072648.1a514005@gibi.dmn.ru>
In-Reply-To:	<051B056B-D858-41E3-83DD-BB9DC4097CC2@qux.com>
References:	<1477080832 DOT 2909 DOT 106 DOT camel AT linetec>
	<201610212041 DOT u9LKfw5r031245 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<1477089908 DOT 2909 DOT 123 DOT camel AT linetec>
	<s6nbmycyci8 DOT fsf AT blaulicht DOT dmz DOT brux>
	<1477129015 DOT 2909 DOT 130 DOT camel AT linetec>
	<141F9C23-F141-42FE-A760-834BBDAA7C2F AT qux DOT com>
	<CAAKZVJnZFhwf1SJpiMirG3YGb6gwcRq0+x=kdf49fRpLmGh=Ew AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<86CE0804-4DB5-402E-9D6A-CAC8C69BF910 AT qux DOT com>
	<CAAKZVJnrMwzVDieg_fOifNsmRrucUY_nN=Nk4L3676tKWUyPnQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<C1CE5556-977E-431C-B2B0-46A529940485 AT qux DOT com>
	<CEAF12F0-D575-44B3-BE14-0C62A55EFBAB AT qux DOT com>
	<20161024061859 DOT 34eba7cc AT gibi DOT dmn DOT ru>
	<051B056B-D858-41E3-83DD-BB9DC4097CC2 AT qux DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Claws Mail 3.14.0 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.3)
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id uA94R8g6003335
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:43:19 -0400
"Roger Williams (roger AT qux DOT com) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> Hi Dmitry, Thanks for the explanation.
> 
> It's a real pity that the change in object selection code
> > 1.6.2 has this potentially dangerous side effect (i.e.
> > when drag-selecting a group of objects, it is nearly
> > always undesirable to partially select an object). In ≤
> > 1.6.2, NO part of an object is selected by a
> > drag-select unless the selection window surrounds the
> > full extent of the object. 
> 
> Can you see a way to revert to that behaviour without
> going into the gschem code?
> 

Honestly, the 5-minutes code snippet above do all what I
want. Thank you for the idea.

- Raw text -