X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
From:	geda AT psjt DOT org (Stephan =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=B6ttcher?=)
To:	"John Griessen \(john\@ecosensory.com\) \[via geda-user\@delorie.com\]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Wilkinson splitter - how to implement and use?
References:	<23abdc31 DOT 72365e7a DOT 572529a9 DOT 212e2 AT o2 DOT pl>
	<a5562efe70ac4b83b066facd19a46167 AT gwp>
	<20160801162742 DOT GA27552 AT recycle DOT lbl DOT gov>
	<20160801184707 DOT 7b3dda2d3c0d13e103a5ec59 AT gmail DOT com>
	<a7acaf21-df0d-d209-d053-fcc470762ea3 AT ecosensory DOT com>
Date:	Mon, 01 Aug 2016 21:36:39 +0200
In-Reply-To:	<a7acaf21-df0d-d209-d053-fcc470762ea3@ecosensory.com> (John
	Griessen's message of "Mon, 1 Aug 2016 12:21:48 -0500")
Message-ID:	<s6n60rkz3g8.fsf@blaulicht.dmz.brux>
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

"John Griessen (john AT ecosensory DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]"
<geda-user AT delorie DOT com> writes:

> There will be a need for resistive layers that can connect, yet not
> trigger a short because of their attributes.  Such resistive layers
> would need to be inside a footprint boundary always to avoid big
> trouble.

Can we please work towards more orthogonality?  Try not to add more
differences to the layout features inside and outside footprints,
please.

I see that there is a problem with connectivity checks when a resistive
layer connects to conductive copper.  You want to flag all connections
that are not part of the same footprint?

-- 
Stephan

- Raw text -