X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Scanned:	amavisd-new at neurotica.com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=neurotica.com;
	s=default; t=1469848966;
	bh=+oN1taMY5J8Jc3Yhxt40NMhWqQ7tKe6jOLXZwQdDEwg=;
	h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To;
	b=jlNPio6Ny23YV4b8Ch17AjruHHV+CUEpp6Jb5r4iJjJ0lZcW1EH/QXFNIAgBT7ioB
	zxN9OjnPy6Bdo4S7oYPWV5DZDGTEAMsr3zYtSjChXYpI3aQQMn4m97K9UX10XrqkAT
	PnLSklyZRw8odU6CUFICMMY6vNvD8ZloN/VYSsXE=
Subject:	KiCad, was Re: [geda-user] Stay or go?
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<98D1C4E4-581D-4A03-94E4-E0330960EADF AT wellesley DOT edu>
	<f1a80c17-5aec-9d4b-81cb-d5a89812e842 AT neurotica DOT com>
	<alpine DOT LRH DOT 2 DOT 01 DOT 1607250832050 DOT 23468 AT homer01 DOT u DOT washington DOT edu>
From:	"Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Message-ID:	<f103a7a3-108a-e253-7fab-d8c99f53bb7a@neurotica.com>
Date:	Fri, 29 Jul 2016 23:22:46 -0400
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.LRH.2.01.1607250832050.23468@homer01.u.washington.edu>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 07/25/2016 11:48 AM, Frank Miles (fpm AT u DOT washington DOT edu) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>>  One big drawback to KiCad that I ran into a little less than a year
>> ago is that it's very difficult to get running if you're using a Linux
>> installation more than, say, a month old.  I'm not one of those guys who
>> reinstalls my OS at the drop of a hat (I come from the commercial UNIX
>> world, not the Windows world) so that just doesn't work for me.
> 
> That's old information, at least in Debian - known in some places as one
> of the least bleeding-edge distributions.  For the current "stable" version
> (Jessie), you can either get an older version of Kicad or get a relatively
> recent release with some substantial enhancements with the debian-backports
> version - i.e. compatible with jessie.  I would think that Ubuntu has as
> current a version.  If you're still running wheezy (oldstable), only the
> older version will be readily available.

  No, this is current information.  The version in the repository
accessible by my Ubuntu system dates from May of 2011.  That's why I
tried (and failed) to compile from sources in the first place.

  If you have the answer, I'm all ears.

              -Dave

-- 
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA

- Raw text -