X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to;
	bh=KHhT0KaA9c1dKUpKb+3Qnlhh4HTFNmQ8h9bTIZGL5TM=;
	b=EgiUjukETzujkvQkBrNsoakMkSDWI51eKPimS4zxt5qlSZcx0HFGjim/dMr5+6yzFE
	PGtQ7tFLKjq++v0WwBQiqRkOgxnIhK/0olGdHjsAqyA8Z00bHWeEfWNOPkECj2PLSnGK
	sc9/P2nbCT4RhrNMMEuI67TpLJYqis6ObfnQws7Ow3JpxkCuYN2TS9poHYUfDTxqBv9t
	HYm5nSAGgG5cySn2UaD6qCaRKfUYvc9r08XAhJ3Zza4gCJ0ClDINZqw4nyZb0ZQPeiE3
	aswQ+6CsC5ezDasXybyNO9VUyazE6Er7quqrxbxMkX444g9uoo6yEaaxhb3650HGzL+e
	b67Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to;
	bh=KHhT0KaA9c1dKUpKb+3Qnlhh4HTFNmQ8h9bTIZGL5TM=;
	b=fVjbLUv8hWD7Pbd5YTZSvMpsl9w37AVAngt9uvsxlSlYpGCWBCnzjwqHoEBmDKEyTi
	RbmpMMfzh32PwJAvLzlA8qWxAIk35zBBXgIHt1bof2Ym6dL6NIPA64wQV0e5mOSj/KlX
	bqHq1FFZEwhJglBfvpZCwcBZonWpXZwcio36P58c9kcJyUv/c5qxFTO3ACcn3SAyHJL8
	gVSWIzfK+HRMI4IIBNEV+/36105Y02yvYd5hL1h27QEylCFidp5V7D7PyAN2Miggj5qf
	4b79P201KABBJkQVohANiKiV4H+Nqwi8budgDGx8uQ0v2mRSUg1KT8ZE4r3LjybhcZiR
	Fe/w==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AD7BkJILnIx0YIZHxzcgb4/DVqUHdlR596wU9k5rMK1CdK9IRGtCVWoyA1KZNF4rpctKnEvO+GTy0vYFDLuGKA==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.60.39.130 with SMTP id p2mr14437415oek.35.1457345810732;
	Mon, 07 Mar 2016 02:16:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:	<CAMvDHVB1kW0Xc2yXZVVoC3VJCwLXDckY7wymwEE4S0GuHm66+A@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<20160223152120 DOT Horde DOT _z0FeIbOqDDq7i7gKTXCeK4 AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de>
	<94CB9E71-127E-4690-9FFC-39722F79260B AT noqsi DOT com>
	<20160228183227 DOT Horde DOT g66UEijK5I0FnHyBsmI3bZU AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de>
	<CAMvDHVCsqDvpRvXL-2BsPWGg5TqME9rtKk-xV+5um2kmnLFgQw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20160229113215 DOT Horde DOT Cr9Z8KUqQeshHqqQ08IN487 AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de>
	<CAMvDHVB1kW0Xc2yXZVVoC3VJCwLXDckY7wymwEE4S0GuHm66+A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Mon, 7 Mar 2016 10:16:50 +0000
Message-ID:	<CAJXU7q--wM5Y1Ta=PDF_ok9gKD911KSOv3JK3qS2Q1CGkKjfVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] hierarchical design - two symbols pointing to one schematic
From:	"Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	gEDA User Mailing List <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

--089e015368f05d20ad052d72c3d3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Regarding the OOM killing...

I'm not certain that gnetlist checks for loops in your heiearchy of
schematics.

If you have inadvertently created a heirarchy which includes some parent
schematic as a descendent of itself, I believe you can get gnetlist to spin
on a loop eating memory.

Peter

--089e015368f05d20ad052d72c3d3
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

<p dir="ltr">Regarding the OOM killing...</p>
<p dir="ltr">I&#39;m not certain that gnetlist checks for loops in your heiearchy of schematics.</p>
<p dir="ltr">If you have inadvertently created a heirarchy which includes some parent schematic as a descendent of itself, I believe you can get gnetlist to spin on a loop eating memory.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Peter</p>

--089e015368f05d20ad052d72c3d3--

- Raw text -