| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
| X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: | vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, |
| definitions=2016-01-30_09:,, signatures=0 | |
| X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: | rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 |
| clxscore=1015 suspectscore=5 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 | |
| bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 | |
| engine=8.0.1-1510270003 definitions=main-1601300348 | |
| X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=icloud.com; h=from : |
| content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version : subject : message-id | |
| : date : references : in-reply-to : to; s=4d515a; | |
| bh=kuWsd6PPgkhlKfRc+gkszapGY1kQbWN9OOGZbOZ2uGM=; | |
| b=Gcb9EDRqq1CvNHs388uWk6NbNjH+dslJvH1Zt26T8mA1vWkfnT6hTdZcTHyRQZRyWS1M | |
| +BrhiD9FihwPjXXaq95t7qPAmpD/6D1WoU4xN0QBxni7zxNNrC2Vu9W7MWINrBXX8d1t | |
| q9YxtvNyGkPML/xsWwlyf2sGlQ+JHm2mGQrqkGmtlDi9al2Auh29E4kEQLGKf3Om5k9I | |
| FY+FRIvrQCG61Qv7/77nIDiG7RAnKdfwJg3ILY9QxIHGHACJaCHfha74i4DVjFfpz7lH | |
| DnlkqApfI3HFmKJcT1mB/17C2Hrq4cNslpibnPJhmclveW98rKx3YkGfiA33XGQudSOO HQ== | |
| Sun-Java-System-SMTP-Warning: | Lines longer than SMTP allows found and wrapped. |
| From: | "Chris Smith (space DOT dandy AT icloud DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
| MIME-version: | 1.0 (1.0) |
| Subject: | Re: [geda-user] The nature of gEDA layers |
| Message-id: | <2E50874E-7A17-4295-B95E-8A626EE9727B@icloud.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 30 Jan 2016 19:32:45 +0000 |
| References: | <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1601180756390 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv> |
| <CAC4O8c-ZyNnCzCDHXkYYabSD4fG8vf+CKmhMycNJujGMPKzQDQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
| <s6nr3h49hrq DOT fsf AT blaulicht DOT dmz DOT brux> | |
| <DDB07351-7C94-4B5C-99FA-83750CD4592A AT noqsi DOT com> | |
| <20160126233332 DOT dec2f06f5c74354a3841989c AT gmail DOT com> | |
| <s6n1t93h4ub DOT fsf AT blaulicht DOT dmz DOT brux> | |
| <20160127091746 DOT 1c7a976c2752f913921688ac AT gmail DOT com> | |
| <s6npowne74w DOT fsf AT blaulicht DOT dmz DOT brux> | |
| <20160127141334 DOT c738feb9dbeb54a7dec3dff8 AT gmail DOT com> | |
| <s6n37tjt1tv DOT fsf AT falbala DOT ieap DOT uni-kiel DOT de> <56A8F74B DOT 8080304 AT ecosensory DOT com> | |
| <CAC4O8c9UKLsh5FAAwUMEtHThKH-w3gUmCU2i9dRW9igkyRt-TQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
| <CAJZxidDmjMtd_fKvR5qZVRa+hwDUbvfaz79oZjkBgDuE1m8RBg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
| <56A961BC DOT 3040405 AT ecosensory DOT com> | |
| <CAJZxidC=nbxAinOtpfGHHqwPXbEMrhfat7jKgA9KBp3EVVg4_Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
| <s6nbn863xlu DOT fsf AT blaulicht DOT dmz DOT brux> <56A9E416 DOT 8080500 AT ecosensory DOT com> | |
| <s6nfuxirm0b DOT fsf AT falbala DOT ieap DOT uni-kiel DOT de> | |
| <CAC4O8c9D-F3p8sAm2UumoE+uoMZM1ufSP=mNEPeHHpn8YrcSyg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
| <20160128200126 DOT 0fe1bb26d5c28e59d56dfd0e AT gmail DOT com> | |
| <CAC4O8c8prUS=NSm_7BCwkCPntsCRRMCMu9--eXXVBtD0C4pYOg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
| <201601282134 DOT u0SLYET7002642 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> | |
| <82868AE2-27A4-44AE-92F2-47A2FAA12BB4 AT icloud DOT com> | |
| <201601301603 DOT u0UG3D4E023424 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> | |
| In-reply-to: | <201601301603.u0UG3D4E023424@envy.delorie.com> |
| To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailer: | iPad Mail (13D15) |
| X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id u0UJWrGM018491 |
| Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Yes, I wasn't trying to say otherwise. PCB is a 2D layout program and it seems to me that the suggestions so far are using complex structures to try and represent a third dimension that PCB has no other use for. All I was trying to say, is why not provide a generic mechanism for the user to say 'at this 2D location layers X, Y and Z are connected'. PCB doesn't need to know how or why the connection exists and can get on with its job of 2D routing. Chris Sent from my iPad > On 30 Jan 2016, at 16:03, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote: > > Despite some folks dreams to the contrary, a layout program is not a > generic CAD program. It has to have *some* understanding of what the > layout *means* in order to be useful to the designer. Otherwise you > might as well use a paint program.
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |