X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=3IuzGNq/AqWmBjp31GpLi167xZbGfk1ovmAHkBOis4E=;
	b=WRfnNC1rZmhCryEhgumz007KCTQkJa9StmP82u+SVuHxHndlI1dqnkVRjfo4k/R66Z
	X0R/xsdtnqF7rCkrMSnM/0QTM9xi/rlYnrA2JtaKFnx8LC+Mxqvdb2FIkG7P0VIBbIdD
	Ajl8Op2qEQGSBl1IhirY5KMXvtKxMAwjbdJP+dQnytSp0OT6dDS81NbK8vvTWMNUsziE
	k7ktbczL+ba1D0V3NFQiUFbHt6jvmsWCBZ2BUcAP3EmDwLMf7SX6FcsNWcQlXcl+7aQE
	S2rcdL6+Xnry07oinWDY9EqTqiFyMlpRcoc4AlcuxwfaRwcc7rG4CtmJ/hrFiZMOQPBp
	WCnQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
	bh=3IuzGNq/AqWmBjp31GpLi167xZbGfk1ovmAHkBOis4E=;
	b=QWKRgMvh0DrG3TYpwXn+p5Vluy8KzZHaRTDwMhjiUiS6A8S62BDfyMJFuY6OBzLpAP
	QqD4LryCcjA01y4WMLLFL1a470D9cOWxDhXn/UfWXxFQYIVF5Wa26u+51Xz+EAnPHtiK
	y86Gi7mZPRLOtNiQMmVOHApXJGWH+DwX7Ch3uZz2HMS9+s9XfqgeLK25oQUM2j1DEx38
	qhL/27v2phRBB88ugV0rPhdhIEVcqfG0gNcD99k9LSocgLkmg8ohtHERAuyDT9hNGGdG
	qkEGk7riciUAf49j9QyGLkV0etzO4K6e6cx+ZFVqa/WZrDj02hi17ytS2j3ug7S1wuqH
	BJXw==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AG10YOTrHSzGDvGxpKxqWDXUy8NCwxW8NWT/2qQj4Kjjg+HpJmFf9LXkS2Y4dgsWKg2VIuq3vYyrwTe5jEyDJA==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.28.90.133 with SMTP id o127mr27720187wmb.101.1453834438185;
	Tue, 26 Jan 2016 10:53:58 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:	<201601261804.u0QI4KEQ009550@envy.delorie.com>
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1601180756390 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1601260416150 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
	<56A751EC DOT 8030402 AT iae DOT nl>
	<20160126124701 DOT 0d061912c7e078ced9d4e6cb AT gmail DOT com>
	<CANEvwqgs3YFnt7m8mA1DN6X2KdWbyr4zpXCVH321vDo1f7CyxA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201601261804 DOT u0QI4KEQ009550 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Tue, 26 Jan 2016 09:53:58 -0900
Message-ID:	<CAC4O8c_qd2GUpL7GzYE8ccPp3=on-FstZe_1e+geLGS5PTNuTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] [pcb] poll: burried/blind vias vs. pcb and pcb-rnd
	(How ?)
From:	"Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:04 AM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>> In this day and age to say blind/buried vias are not needed is ridiculous.
>> The fact is ANY design that requires even one FPGA, custom ASIC or
>> medium to large BGA needs blind/buried vias.
>>
>> This is factual and is easy vetted.
>
> If you can afford a custom ASIC, you can afford a top-end EDA package,
> and a FAB that supports high-end features.  Frankly, PCB is not a
> high-end package and custom ASIC users are not our target audience.
>
> I can't afford any of that tech.  Heck, I can barely afford 4-layer
> boards with 6/6 rules.  There's a huge community of designers that
> can't (or won't) afford high tech features in their boards.
>
> So you can say "this is factual" but it's not.  It may be a
> requirement for a subset of our potential user base, but it's not
> ridiculous to assume that many people just aren't going to use them.
> Until we decide to support that tech, we're simply targetting the
> "many people" who don't need them.

Extra layers are not that expensive and most boards that care about
density at all blind vias can make layout a lot easier even if they
aren't absolutely required.  It seems like the major missing feature
in pcb to me, and a pretty good guess that people would use them if
they were available.

Britton

- Raw text -