X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-SourceIP:	86.89.1.39
X-Authenticated-Sender:	b DOT mykendevelopment AT upcmail DOT nl
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] [pcb] poll: burried/blind vias vs. pcb and pcb-rnd
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1601180756390 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1601260416150 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
From:	myken <myken AT iae DOT nl>
Message-ID:	<56A751EC.8030402@iae.nl>
Date:	Tue, 26 Jan 2016 12:01:00 +0100
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/38.5.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1601260416150.9035@igor2priv>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 26/01/16 04:21, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
> there's no strong demand for blind/burried vias

The conclusion from the poll is also that there is no strong demand to 
support/provide windows binaries.

However IMO blind/burried vias and windows availability are essential to 
attract new users, I do hope that that broader scope is picked-up by 
main stream pcb.

Cheers,
Robert.

- Raw text -