X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=cMnGNxMuFL8/peipGfBVbWaFL0lLHDPH+5RujonylWc=;
	b=JL5pNXvAFfdNOW5qlmi4dKkELz6yIm3LGQwwvVlTIrkXvpYBshYz5ZBXTmmv+5pRrO
	m/b5c+dy6Z0HuxTROu2+7V9s9DCfCOPxhPf+X3d3KqCyzjQvXl904J2K4yiQN0HBMQ6i
	uweCMqVsogRkJVMDzBV3+p/L/J0EnKlMuZblJPh52y+q98aC5Z+6bfPwyuaIKWNEexwy
	btCZKlKMK7tL8a9p3Ku1J+K/mtkgcxchh9/eJ7aFGfWNr8yUXZc7aWrv25DXsFOf6L2r
	CirO7kv5HwSlf0aycfRd9Y6dLDcuiVBXUeY0oLvU9PGjs84etaKHIBPvW5uVV3guQJpq
	UGDg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
	bh=cMnGNxMuFL8/peipGfBVbWaFL0lLHDPH+5RujonylWc=;
	b=mWvOHCwt143/G5MuKyjBg4pv8mo1oDSPQCZdSCJhFEdVrSaVdEomqcGpTEOytDc8oK
	3sDGdo0VpkrLdZMe/ryFRl+MGHBDzKUh+RFh1dKTgbh1qFuUhzbmJ7zA50lgVwE0SSJE
	RJAlP9m0DIhcJbuUinwhTS5pqH/ICN5nnbZ1bPW1JXUeTPqB2Hvl4SHG0fhxZhAzljkF
	LsYricEq/U4jPZKaTNjertGyMk6XMqN9IrFleStcohHq9j83m8YOlEGX0zak9O4dBIrS
	7dI5Phv3mjEyNI6N8XQsJszGBbvQ+w7YRxccGAau/HGvycTqnwZzLiDCrqR2H883Mmeg
	xcoQ==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AG10YORvPWMP6kT6Umv6CVcxz5XBUalLjJx4LlMRoqrj7jXJg5qC8xf9T2BOyvD6O5hAYzVeAsFK7QKpDdzglw==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.194.6.165 with SMTP id c5mr1683065wja.88.1453451043353; Fri,
	22 Jan 2016 00:24:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:	<20160121193929.11E5881053E4@turkos.aspodata.se>
References:	<20160102091556 DOT BBC6D809D79B AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
	<CAJXU7q_Zwyfpcb4g00QCFNTjQ9Le2Tm8WjKz3CKMnNXb7gMceg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20160102131252 DOT F383A809D79A AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
	<CAMvDHVCi5wR78jybhOEG0EmKyqWVpeaoYFuyWkWSrtkxF7kXQw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20160121144142 DOT 2703D81053E4 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
	<20160121161958 DOT GB4788 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<20160121174016 DOT E995881053E3 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
	<20160121184048 DOT GD4788 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<20160121193929 DOT 11E5881053E4 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jan 2016 11:24:03 +0300
Message-ID:	<CAMvDHVB1jRzDJ_sJnpBwT-YEDSphiLLVVsDYW+jKW0NNKTq2dA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] should we broaden scope of libgeda
From:	"Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Karl,

On 1/21/16, karl AT aspodata DOT se <karl AT aspodata DOT se> wrote:
...
> Well, he had 3 objections,
>  1 regexp (which I fixed),
>  2 scheme (I didn't know scheme well enought, so I couldn't fix that)
>  3 something about "precedence ordering" which I didn't understand,
>    I asked about it but he didn't explain it

IMO, 3 is the consequence of non-2. It is much more easy for
mere gEDA user to change order of looking through the directories
in rc-files (which are Scheme code) rather than in C code.

We should make things simpler for users, right?

OTOH, I don't think that even glib is simpler than guile or less
error-prone. However, it also depends on what you already know.

Cheers,
  Vladimir

- Raw text -