X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=QO0TISEtlTRIiiFJr9yO2WJmSRZXDthqi8OFOuJtzM4=;
	b=plaTyxBEZXStwHhqHQ9DCx+YJTpks4gRhDFtqKwoL4VAyrXdn4r9TDvvE61Q7Fs7qX
	RMgxnl/sYG8bwksbL8/1Mtmt/nf32xyjrKQ515IApYKz88O76Lg36rb+vvxZsShpBC+F
	4tcS/mn0vp2VkoZL9pByPx7axfE31zZE263ErRmVR8lRmRlpdnHr969OPSh+a+j62IVS
	CudIXAEMKMnPLknhxHdFEVbGH3LR24PdYiCG4XD9bc6kFH/bDMPjjFJ0c0NHmiaK4D5x
	imPhz2LjuVTAsRCvVg4JpLvsC/emb8wBKjiC0s/vMux2OYnG7goOeKgsutiKSH/S6Ae7
	x8aA==
X-Received:	by 10.194.79.37 with SMTP id g5mr6840678wjx.89.1452069780456;
	Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:43:00 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Wed, 6 Jan 2016 09:42:54 +0100
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] A fileformat library
Message-Id:	<20160106094254.36b962ab700583cf4aa44716@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAC4O8c8cVr1H3skmbGo4Rhf5ZTZj8bDxJw8a9C4qfHeGyXZ4XA@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<1512221837 DOT AA25291 AT ivan DOT Harhan DOT ORG>
	<0FCF3774-F93C-4BFF-BB61-636F75DCCACB AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c_UAiFE-vGfoE2tXppHLhaa0dSYz9o_rkdCBo7_SRRtxw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<FFBE7623-E240-4798-96B0-2BECF56C8E29 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c980g1gj15=5njstC_BT-WYDgKQx9BRycdFKA8OvgtiOg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<B54C0E1F-1986-4C79-9F70-7F1919B8B26D AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c9bxJP1eMG4yz3YwKkQJRmsDGmLQ0aMd5pJRyu0WpdCtQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<C1CFCCEE-C64A-4E49-AA64-446C061656D6 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c-zt8B=joDd+ws77D2jt6aZf3MWfR_dAvpzGcNuBrTURQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1601030040320 DOT 2176 AT newt>
	<D9825C8C-B6FD-4C7F-A8D5-B8AF06253B72 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c_R5xWLmzj_cz0g0mPWNs6mR4efjXKGBoup8YO6nwnPTA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<A942261D-7C25-4F2D-9CB1-FFC60FA1C160 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c8zk8=Py1yX6fVqF+35SYe39Li=y4jZ8bCeZ1Ev8WccAg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20160105182120 DOT 3237F809D79B AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
	<CAC4O8c8cVr1H3skmbGo4Rhf5ZTZj8bDxJw8a9C4qfHeGyXZ4XA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> > > other respect binary is better.
> >
> > I counter that.
> > . you have to check a binary file for valid values just as you do for a
> >   text file
> > . if your binary file is in some way invalid, you will have a greater
> >   problem correcting it than a text file
> > . discussing why a file is invalid is easier with a text file
> > . a binary file might be smaller, but that does not matter much
> > . text files are better provided for by version systems (e.g. git)
> > . it is easier to write tools that write text than binary, because
> >   debugging the output is easier
> >
> 
> Regarding vcs of text data files for GUI program, it's a stretch to claim
> that the fact that they're text makes them much more compatible.  The diffs
> are only useful for the most trivial of cases.  For it to be really useful
> you need a (non-text) diff viewer of  some sort.

Two diffs might work better: netlist for topology and symbol values.

> ...
> A little while back a PhD Stefan Salewski put together a very good start on
> a very nice router.  IIRC he said 300-400 hours of effort, probably about
> $100k worth with overhead in the american market.  It's not C (for good
> reasons) and currently can't talk to pcb at all.  I would like to somehow
> arrange things such than efforts like this could maybe get used.

Would it be possible to write it down somewhere? Maybe on the wishlist so others know about it?

- Raw text -