X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=aWJbDZFiFy7hzRInJnYCdcOg112zmDaR7KQ7wfFJ4jE=;
	b=i6x2vbhBtC4IES1Ed6oJ1z0ZJjYFI7mV2B6XhNBSzmf7YV832TGShAeZA4IF4q0DxI
	RIzLhF8fGy3PeJAc5MXzAjDkRL8BWMqwoovL1tAzPAC++WD39iU9E+pee5zei9ZmHizf
	YzA8v3VQghOaQz155EGLkPoV45KLZgjWZEVjI8u+tMW8NoBgZL6WGoo19bVapjd5Nxx1
	dZOBXZOaM638DRXQt0sWsbYgMr6/7cO2oKKPV8okyPL5hNldc5IwudMzr0aTorqfaruo
	1xGcn7Vlc8h3LMSWArWrm/gLaUMXFIkS2R7YBTDsPC4lOcGKgq9bpi2fh4CdN06hL2cn
	oAgw==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.60.246.43 with SMTP id xt11mr50112517oec.48.1451773193161;
	Sat, 02 Jan 2016 14:19:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:	<201601022207.u02M7l9I028275@envy.delorie.com>
References:	<CAC4O8c_p5bMB1cKzDEsQFSnbZvY3TgnczH94pO_qCoJmiv2iWQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAJXU7q9rMcQpLU5020RoZTqskT4moOS6f3Ugw+g3_mhO565MLg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c-nPx1isS2DA4=X1vQFVY51vQ6pAY6sSfHBMog_m0_2dg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAJXU7q8jLiY2oAGmkgfXfzdNoAg2xVRx8bxgAXyF_qqYs=9Dgw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201601022207 DOT u02M7l9I028275 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Sat, 2 Jan 2016 22:19:53 +0000
Message-ID:	<CAJXU7q8_qqnA0ay3A8RAvsrOzg4XE30Ux8oDMjRrEGK4gQHfrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Merging stuff. How to make it happen
From:	"Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	gEDA User Mailing List <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

--001a11368e4079131f052861494e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Ok,

I'd still be interested to take a quick look, as there were one or two
things that jumped out at me as possibly warranting some discussion.

Peter
On 2 Jan 2016 22:09, "DJ Delorie" <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

>
> > too. (If we catch Bert or DJ too by any chance, that would also be cool).
>
> If it's the set of patches I'm thinking about, I did the initial
> review here on geda-user already.  I think everything was resolved
> except whether we wanted to require a C99 compiler or not.
>

--001a11368e4079131f052861494e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p dir=3D"ltr">Ok, </p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">I&#39;d still be interested to take a quick look, as there w=
ere one or two things that jumped out at me as possibly warranting some dis=
cussion.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">Peter</p>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 2 Jan 2016 22:09, &quot;DJ Delorie&quot; &lt;=
<a href=3D"mailto:dj AT delorie DOT com">dj AT delorie DOT com</a>&gt; wrote:<br type=3D"=
attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;b=
order-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
&gt; too. (If we catch Bert or DJ too by any chance, that would also be coo=
l).<br>
<br>
If it&#39;s the set of patches I&#39;m thinking about, I did the initial<br=
>
review here on geda-user already.=C2=A0 I think everything was resolved<br>
except whether we wanted to require a C99 compiler or not.<br>
</blockquote></div>

--001a11368e4079131f052861494e--

- Raw text -