X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=DYPLWg9EFD2wEKsbM7P2PdbGLRX1rz/oBGCrlKy40/8=;
	b=0u2gYLLCw7IIHz0/88K3ckZVD3cFq1nq05XWGiB0QqDnL+Y/yfQRAPymQNtNbJbVGk
	sAvs/7wYqK+bCzz+9yjQSpxydJsmY8HLxc9Z9XlBHJJ6OrZLaMvp46SY0kHy1M8hvp7t
	IFOHQGE20ZKTpyMcDQ4C2miPjZ5JVpNxUyZ26ABUfdQaHrv3kQj/Et/nvlRtYEbJz5Fg
	VYdc+gdy7gxIjR9SuCwThV14493lfjFokKQuMY1xiWbo5MQswMkE/+OMAdKLknSg57dp
	cZ6rIGFstm3aWdMHb1Qt8j4h+Vkh6sIWasYi4GyAejG8HRar3w36lLY9w1qQ9xIjJkP0
	dTuQ==
X-Received:	by 10.112.138.135 with SMTP id qq7mr28325623lbb.21.1451755664794;
	Sat, 02 Jan 2016 09:27:44 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Sat, 2 Jan 2016 18:27:39 +0100
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] ideas on slotting and mechanisms for
	grouping/associating heterogenous symbols.
Message-Id:	<20160102182739.5d195829880cf75768ae0a82@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<56880043.7040003@ecosensory.com>
References:	<CAM2RGhS4L-ch6FEcLtdSt0vA0BdQZvq+AuFDP+9ea7Ftd=AALg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<8444F816-17CE-4A56-A982-4A60DEDA72B8 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1512300544550 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
	<87FC7D4C-157A-499E-8B93-97653D6A7C68 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1601012231450 DOT 1728 AT newt>
	<AE52C1DB-01A3-43FA-AE8E-68AD33F37180 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<624E6A69-62CE-4FCB-9D44-9FDF036254A3 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<56880043 DOT 7040003 AT ecosensory DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> > I would be interested to hear everyone’s ideas on slotting and mechanisms for grouping/associating heterogenous symbols.
> 
> The symbol name (or refdes) should be the sole indicator that something is grouped.  That is a group at the symbol level that has 
> no position or pin sequence order information in it.

I agree, refdes is good choice.

> I would use a separate script to process pin swaps that utilizes a pinswap number attribute that is
> not part of symbols as they are in the library, but added when you need it. ...

I agree swap information should not be part of symbols. It would however probably be good if pcb could handle swap especially pin swap of ordinary capacitors and resistors.


Nicklas Karlsson

- Raw text -