X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
	:user-agent;
	bh=TY380o+gC4ShDNj9O4m3K4hOm0URZJiN0Rxa2jcILjA=;
	b=b3VeybwzoljnG0rnYxIOdyclDjitwE1NnTdQ3aqCSpf8ijLfqCNbSVixSHhEnrlvDz
	BEN+sxl04MGS5QFx0FCWokCG33EF3DrM02O02nH6S487RAok5tGSI/L9gGKixiqnPD86
	aW2BpsSZi+POOA2eHr1sDOBe/5A0I4uL1EcZrV0lRoB/NTLcLu5I2tS9NwmJ/w07FyVM
	f+Bi49xpSn+HzmwZew+FdOcV/t+49eMvXuRonvNB5VfqSqt3+gyvzEk2hJJzQq4RfszK
	5QCxfZEJwA8ASIJphBG+DDw7b87TjvSYBbeohttqpFs4jwu+DeQ/g72jgLiwMuKFcMVk
	5qGg==
X-Received:	by 10.25.41.193 with SMTP id p184mr7581428lfp.150.1451530043375;
	Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:47:23 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Thu, 31 Dec 2015 05:47:21 +0300
From:	"Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Re: Positive discussion topic thread
Message-ID:	<20151231024721.GC19555@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<CAJXU7q8BsPKicvAgFvaigLBmT9CS3dJ_eFYR84mwWEg-=Vyg8Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAJXU7q9RrJO8=rLG5rdnH_MHQRCO8oghxoGrsao7NfSMEPb+0A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151230181538 DOT 32790b5b AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org>
	<201512310212 DOT tBV2C3MK029574 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<201512310212.tBV2C3MK029574@envy.delorie.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 09:12:03PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> > 1. Do we need to separate geda and pcb?
> 
> Since most users use them together, no.
> 
> > 2. Do we need a new name for pcb?
> 
> How about "Ralph" ?

:)
nnnn
I would suggest just 'geda-pcb'. This name wouldn't break our
community and possibly wouldn't insult anybody. It wouldn't
require any changes in our current documentation, either.

Regards,
  Vladimir

- Raw text -