X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
	:from:to:content-type;
	bh=Pfp5YpisiYDzFiSmTpoXkQoLMicePIlXsNTKN55DMi8=;
	b=KbmZbvu/dwBo9PE3uNGzeyohvnistRiufBF/JYDLkggsPeEXZY6MZHzQrMG1tJIWZ4
	K7FNNNy3d6Zc8Qus9SWAsZTPEXpFCxavdgkbl4qfD9DQa6GYlYnz68zIXPWtvVCiGJ6U
	BuHps1S3RXrt0Z7q/x1GevGMPadurEwqj2o2ZPruLnmZ3f2c+ToP28OiLUEhwVpu9OJj
	Ki9gZfAdxodxuUd0ib2Ry2GPUgBen8PmHt2RK5WX4z4Ld54RdtvWXo4YQyVoz21h5Uwm
	J0ebyTEL1BQnnfA7JZ1TncyyYSj+ZJhuA3yno7QaGee5TnTXafWFMaPnBA3M5dbn5j7h
	Rl5w==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.202.232.84 with SMTP id f81mr4719837oih.103.1451343233979;
	Mon, 28 Dec 2015 14:53:53 -0800 (PST)
Sender:	svenn DOT bjerkem AT gmail DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<43CC8F96-6452-40FA-9DFB-E0983721C19C@noqsi.com>
References:	<CAJXU7q_3XwthnN_8mp7B+-ShHeK+=7J=54ZavKBUG3S3bSKp2A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CANEvwqiM7CKG+WpDRpG4L=HsmSEZ32=CBDyUhuk3ks-SNedL2Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<43CC8F96-6452-40FA-9DFB-E0983721C19C AT noqsi DOT com>
Date:	Mon, 28 Dec 2015 23:53:53 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth:	uRriYCKX_k3vjI14Sedy2Xpa8gw
Message-ID:	<CAGde_xPX8FB57SR-siOf5Udien1H04VVLd4fEFmJJDn30U4MvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Project leadership
From:	"Svenn Are Bjerkem (svenn DOT bjerkem AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 28 December 2015 at 20:48, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:
> There are really two projects here: The original gEDA (now confusingly
> called geda-gaf), and pcb. I think everyone agrees that pcb needs a lot of
> work. On the other hand, geda-gaf is matiure, effective, and easy to extend
> with scripting. Pcb development requires a great deal of collaboration.
> Geda-gaf development mostly does not, as anybody can write and publish a
> script.

I would not call a generic schematic capture tool mature until it
provides the designer use of buses and bus pins in his design without
the need to actually name the nets to have connection.

-- 
Svenn

- Raw text -