X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
	:user-agent;
	bh=Oyp7fE8pFS/mGowpRlEQtSPC5ZlqNUbuE68SrjLiK6g=;
	b=tjtF9nlqT98QbWCSobb+tmACnLVvUVlnF/VscpnGo3T/nS0+C9MKI1bRX1pxYzFx8B
	00XlwEYN21YWi8hdFLHcMKJ+BHhhxCB8uvXBmK4Ub6Jksav4n7mnxH2dpd9Q7ktdsW81
	/rBoSZCTP2uwVJaHo0w+3Ch4A4EJ8AN3qYfPcbEG/frvB0wcDPfGBwNr5kVQS5y62XRH
	q8EqExRiSaYWQUU/73mARseVtIJeWYs9XAuVRih/PkySorEn0lxS0+U/iWXscHVNIYXI
	VA8zHOWgGUYpJ8dC+YCZ9ojzc11SrkPq2BN7ARuyJQQFovT6+1GBqsIWdCRL73JEFXF6
	Y74w==
X-Received:	by 10.112.136.103 with SMTP id pz7mr4132708lbb.3.1450897961767;
	Wed, 23 Dec 2015 11:12:41 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Wed, 23 Dec 2015 22:12:39 +0300
From:	"Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] merge please (or rebase if you must)
Message-ID:	<20151223191239.GA3632@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<CAC4O8c_Jc98kmjDp_O2hKbY9BWWAjGk+nb0L5L=jqXfeTAYGGA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201512152309 DOT tBFN90dS016514 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c8jaeiyrD4eEcWAR69GC=nd__gBLfPtstNUfQDAstvBcA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151217115354 DOT 19720 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<CAC4O8c_KiWwseSSdEFw=W0c5ewZscSNiQ7Jxy7d0MuDQyxxgBg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAC4O8c_KiWwseSSdEFw=W0c5ewZscSNiQ7Jxy7d0MuDQyxxgBg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 04:33:06PM -0900, Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
...
> Isn't the windows port broken anyway?  And if a pre-C99 is the latest and
> greatest available on Cygwin or whatever it is, I probably wouldn't try to
> fix it (that way at least).
I built the last pcb release for m$windows using mingw and at
least its gtk GUI worked ;)

Cheers,
  Vladimir

- Raw text -