| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
| X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Envelope-From: | paubert AT iram DOT es |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Oct 2015 12:58:34 +0200 |
| From: | "Gabriel Paubert (paubert AT iram DOT es) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
| To: | "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
| Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Reduce pinnumber attribute |
| Message-ID: | <20151021105834.GA18232@visitor2.iram.es> |
| References: | <20151021121348 DOT f3d3f466d0761fbd551f82ce AT gmail DOT com> |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To: | <20151021121348.f3d3f466d0761fbd551f82ce@gmail.com> |
| User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
| X-Spamina-Bogosity: | Unsure |
| X-Spamina-Spam-Score: | -0.2 (/) |
| X-Spamina-Spam-Report: | Content analysis details: (-0.2 points) |
| pts rule name description | |
| ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- | |
| -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP | |
| 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% | |
| [score: 0.4987] | |
| 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. | |
| See | |
| http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block | |
| for more information. | |
| [URIs: delorie.com] | |
| Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:13:48PM +0200, Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> I assume pinnumber attribute is used to uniquely identify a pin.
>
> For almost all if not all cases I guess the pinlabel could be used as symbol pin number. If netlister use pinlabel attribute if no pinnumber attribute is available number of attributes could be reduced.
>
> Are there any disadvantages?
Slotting actually overrides pinnumbers.
And slotting is not obsolete. I don't use it heavily for
components that provide multiple instances of the same
function, like 7400 or 7474, but I have started using it
extensively for things like monitoring.
I typically put an ADC to monitor voltages, currents,
temperatures, PLL voltages and maybe other things. At
the input of the ADC, there is a multiplexer like an
ADG731 (32 inputs) which selects the voltage which is
going to be measured.
For the multiplexer I have defined two symbols:
- a small, single pin symbol which has 32 slot
definitions. Instances of these symbols end up
being spread all over the design.
- another larger symbol with the rest of the chip
which typically ends up close to the ADC and
either a microcontroller or an FPGA.
Gabriel
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |