X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=SgoF3HxTszveUrBGeOYCfvxR5cl04mfKFabO6OH852Y=;
	b=iSNzdpA4jAkYTibb59v3Ljxb2iEzDvN0aSD5rs9mF2vdgf4eUbshRDoqhIyfts2fAC
	WuOl47nJTy2e0OYQAcuj3wVPUAWZB+glru2ZdymmFoFYZjE1g6xy5y9vPESjINmVC1kM
	wUM179xGGNdPq9LHy+x1LUuV+q5JwCfLthP5Clpa2JADgpjPEdcrf3R7tCovg+fXJHQH
	BU8rrRgMguXojrji5UKIcKn85WC4ZwhwAxUDsgf1v9beOFTttBi7Z9xDWfE37ynJsVlq
	U4JUG+Q6ilOZuWpjlqwTFaeFkJbzxuSRrCEMa3fojVCyhio9jQ2YAjm/GeEKLBcaItsf
	y7SQ==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.112.147.232 with SMTP id tn8mr2385264lbb.84.1444848130608;
	Wed, 14 Oct 2015 11:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<561E9AD7.6070606@zoot.drehmel.com>
References:	<CAM2RGhThg+5B6iGQ__Uh4=MxPeSVb9p1gS_9C+ik--E8AqS3GA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<561BEDF6 DOT 6020105 AT zoot DOT drehmel DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhT7Ma=q+ttcYTFZanm+mTb6VSVCR0siB+o+O0XYuipEqg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<561E9AD7 DOT 6070606 AT zoot DOT drehmel DOT com>
Date:	Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:42:10 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhTFac+zJQdGY9DhFgTB2VwN8v=-0X79HEuDehPRQfP7KQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] The Chippocolypse is coming!
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	gEDA users mailing list <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Robert Drehmel <robert AT zoot DOT drehmel DOT com> wrote:
> On 10/12/2015 08:08 PM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via
> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Robert Drehmel <robert AT zoot DOT drehmel DOT com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for the head up, Evan. I just finished a large design that
>>> contains
>>> 11 LME49860s, 5 LME49870s and 2 LME49610s. Looks like the prototype on my
>>> desk will be the first and last one built.
>>
>>
>> The part that really bothers me is how TI's own website does not list
>> some of these as being end of life. LME49710 is still listed as active
>> on it's product page.
>
>
> Same for all the parts I mentioned. Incredibly bad information policy.
>
> Here's another post from today, directly from a TI employee:
>
> https://e2e.ti.com/support/amplifiers/audio_amplifiers/f/6/t/461541

The LME49710 in the TO99 package is not on this list?! Do they make
the same silicon at another fab just for that package?!

-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -