X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<20151003175604.21282.qmail@stuge.se>
Date:	Sat, 3 Oct 2015 19:56:04 +0200
From:	"Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Clutterless user interface or even more custom
	special super features?
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<56100AF8 DOT 4090802 AT jump-ing DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<56100AF8.4090802@jump-ing.de>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> 3. Try to make Undo() independent from this query.

Certainly!

> 4. Remove these special modes. That'd be LOCKNAMESFLAG, HIDENAMESFLAG
> and ONLYNAMESFLAG.
..
> 5.: 3. and 4. together.

Maybe.


> I tend to do 4., then 3..

Removing a user-visible feature risks breaking someone's workflow no
matter how awkward or obscure the feature is.

The question is what to do if someone reports a regression. WONTFIX
is valid, as is a longer-term project to change the data model, so
that these operations are just a superset of more generic operations.

I for one wouldn't mind pcb losing this particular complexity.

Thanks for looking into it.


//Peter

- Raw text -